this post was submitted on 10 Apr 2026
948 points (99.3% liked)
Political Memes
11807 readers
2533 users here now
Welcome to politcal memes!
These are our rules:
1) Be civil
Jokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.
2) No misinformation
Don’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.
3) Posts should be memes
Random pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.
4) No bots, spam or self-promotion
Follow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.
5) No AI generated content.
Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
The irony is "necessities".
Plenty of unemployed people out there enjoying life on levels you'll never get to ibecause of "nice to haves" being classified as "necessities".
It's something only the top echelon of Earth's population could be plagued with. The same proportion with the high suicide rates and mental health issues. The ones that can't live without being in a "developed" society.
Are you talking about working class people here or billionaires? If working class then I'd like to know what country since I was laid off a few months ago and unemployment doesn't cover my rent even if I were to save it all and forgo eating
if it is necessary the industry behind it should not be allowed to profit and should be run and owned by the working public.
Alternatively what if it does profit but all the profit goes towards public good? I.e. into the communal balance.
If you mean letting public goods be run with a profit incentive for the purpose of increasing efficiency or such, I think what you'll find every time is that the service shifts focus to the median user and disregards fringe cases like users with disabilities, remote areas, etc. I would also expect material quality to degrade as those with cheaper up-front costs would be valued over expensive durable ones.
no i meant more in the sense of: instead of the company not being allowed to profit, they can profit but 50% of the profit goes into the communal balance.
it would be easier to implement that because all you have to do is to order that 50% of the company shares go towards the city/municipality.
that’s not the kind of profit of which i spoke. but ok!
yeah it would be easier to integrate into our existing legal system