this post was submitted on 30 Mar 2026
1070 points (97.9% liked)

People Twitter

9826 readers
571 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician. Archive.is the best way.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] finallymadeanaccount@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Unless Dickhead drops a nuke and threatens more. Which I wouldn't put past him.

[–] Tiresia@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Imagine if Iran nuked Washington DC, or even every American city with a population over 1 million. Would the US government surrender? Would the American people surrender even if the government did?

I imagine the US government would retreat to its mountain bunkers and say "come and get it", and many American civilians would join or support guerillas to fight any Iranian attempt at occupation. And that's true despite many Americans hating the current regime.

So why would the Iranian government or its people be any different?

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Iran doesn’t have 5,177 nuclear warheads.

I’m not saying you’re wrong; I suspect the IRGC is stubborn enough to never surrender no matter what happens to Iran's civilians… But that’s because they’re stupid.

Hence I think this is a bad analogy, as Japan surrendered in exactly the circumstances you’re describing. In Man In The High Castle, the US did too, and I think that’s a plausible fictional scenario, as nuclear war basically makes resistance impractical.