this post was submitted on 30 Mar 2026
1069 points (97.9% liked)

People Twitter

9820 readers
522 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician. Archive.is the best way.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space 101 points 1 week ago (77 children)

They can just hold the world’s supply of oil, ammonia and helium to ransom. Breaking an Iranian blockade by force would require a WW2-scale effort, with the US, Europe, China and the gulf states fighting alongside each other to take Tehran and impose some kind of regime change all parties find acceptable.

[–] piccolo@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Isnt china and Iran allies and already have agreements for discounted oil trades?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] brownsugga@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago

China and Russia would be fighting against the EU and US in that hypothetical wwiii scenario

load more comments (75 replies)
[–] fizzle@quokk.au 51 points 1 week ago (10 children)

Honestly I give the iranian disinformation team 1 of 5 stars, a pathetic job really.

I mean, they don't actually need to have the Epstein files, they can just start sharing stuff that seems plausible.

[–] CPMSP@midwest.social 15 points 1 week ago (2 children)

They are making Lego memes that are pretty fire though.

[–] fizzle@quokk.au 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Are they though?

It would be pretty easy to eviscerate Trump.

The videos and memes I've seen are a bit vanilla. More about trying to make Iran seem righteous and wholesome than trying to embarrass Trump.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[–] brotundspiele@sh.itjust.works 44 points 1 week ago (12 children)

I honestly don't understand how you Americans still seem to believe that anything in the Epstein files could possibly harm Trump. It was known before the 2016 election, that he was peeping in dressing rooms at Miss Teen contests. Before the 2016 election he bragged about sexually assalting women. Before the 2024 election he was convicted for sexual abuse.

And people did vote for him, not despite of that, but because of it. Because they are misogynistic assholes who adore and envy him for doing stuff like that.

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

He raped a 13 year old violently and there's probably video in those epstein files.

[–] brotundspiele@sh.itjust.works 18 points 1 week ago (3 children)

And? These allegations were also known since 2016. But that didn't stop anyone from voting for him, twice.

  • His Conspiracy Theorist supporters will call it an AI fake, created by the deep state.
  • For his Christian voters he'll be redeemed if he pays 50 shekels to the girls father and marries her.
  • His nazi supporters might say: "Whell that's not nice. But at least he's getting rid of the immigrants."
  • His sexist supporters will say "Well 13 might be a bit young, but after all it's her fault for wearing such a short skirt. And with these kids nowadays you never know their real age".
  • His MAGA supporters will say "I don't care, he's our saviour. If he deems such things necessary, who am I to question him."
  • The Idiots say "Well he might be an asshole, but Kamala Harris also did some bad things."
  • And his courts say that it's already barred or he's got immunity or he just enacts a new law that makes rape legal if the perpetrator is a politician. He'll have the Congress's support, as soon as the files are released.

Did I forget anyone?

[–] rmrf@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Those things aren't known by everyone. My conservative MIL didn't vote for Trump having known about those things, but my SIL did. She was shocked when I told her about it.

Americans generally aren't as well educated as many other countries of its caliber and a bit part of that manifests in media literacy and general interest in anything, really. My SIL claims she made her decision to vote for him because his campaign page was more convincing about lowering prices and Karris' I kid you not.

Yeah this is a single anecdote about a single person, but this largely has been my experience.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
[–] frustrated_phagocytosis@fedia.io 38 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Fuck that, trade it for Trump dead or alive

[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 26 points 1 week ago

or alive

No no, let's keep it simple.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 27 points 1 week ago

They already released most of the victims names, they can't really pretend they care about them anymore.

[–] testaccount372920@piefed.zip 25 points 1 week ago (16 children)

I've been seing stuff like this a lot lately, but it seems detached from reality to me. How does Iran benefit from the Epstein files?

[–] fibojoly@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 week ago

Because Trump is 100% willing to start a war so people stop talking about it. So he'll have to start another war somewhere else...

[–] Yeller_king@reddthat.com 7 points 1 week ago (4 children)

The reasoning would be: You're right. They don't care. But he will never voluntarily release them and it results in maximum embarrassment.

It wouldn't be a sincere negotiating tactic but it works because they don't need to negotiate.

[–] PhoenixDog@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

This. Imagine a condition for terms of surrender is to unredact and release all files. And the Trump administration openly says "no" to that?

That would be a TERRIBLE admission by the administration

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] fizzle@quokk.au 7 points 1 week ago

I think the thinking is that if you released the epstein files in their entirety Trump would be impeached.

Or maybe that's not really it. If you wanted to harm the US, then releasing the full unredacted epstein files is probably the easiest way to achieve maximum chaos.

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] Skullgrid@lemmy.world 24 points 1 week ago (5 children)

why would they want the US regime to change? It's a poor long term strategy, you want the useless idiots to ruin their country, not have them replaced by competent people.

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 34 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I think they would prefer people who weren't bombing their country with Israel.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] MalReynolds@slrpnk.net 7 points 1 week ago

“Never interrupt your enemy when he is making a mistake” - Napoleon Bonaparte

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] reddit_sux@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Demanding Epstein files would be a sure shot way to get bombed.

[–] PhoenixDog@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

As if they're not already?

[–] Scubus@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 week ago

The issue with this is that Iran wants to strait open eventually, its a huge financial gain.

[–] Soapbox@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Most of Trumps supporters think all the Trump-Epstien connections are liberal fabrications. Some of them are convinced that Trump was a secret FBI agent working undercover to expose the whole operation.

Hard evidence will never convince the delusional masses who worship him.

MAGAts only wanted the files released so they could be used to attack "them librul pedos"

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›