Ask Lemmygrad

1339 readers

17 users here now

A place to ask questions of Lemmygrad's best and brightest

founded 3 years ago

MODERATORS

Shaggy0291@lemmygrad.ml

GrainEater@lemmygrad.ml

SovereignState@lemmygrad.ml

QueerCommie@lemmygrad.ml

yogthos@lemmygrad.ml

Question about the tendency to be reactionary of the the intelligentsia, and new petite bourgeoisie and labor aristocracy (lemmy.ml)

submitted 3 months ago by Confidant6198@lemmy.ml to c/asklemmygrad@lemmygrad.ml

16 comments fedilink hide all child comments

If the intelligentsia, and new petite bourgeoisie and labor aristocracy tend to be reactionary and tend to align with the bourgeoisie, how do we get to keep the infrastructure that they run without them holding it hostage against the revolution?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] DonLongSchlong@lemmygrad.ml 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

So if a scholar is also a marxist-leninist and teaches at an university they are automatically intelligentsia? Even if they support ML/Communist ideas?

I assume it works like the Engels situation. He was part of the bourgeoisie, but acted like a class traitor as far as I understand.

So, that professor imo would be part of the intelligentsia, but, if he actually teaches ML ideas, acts as a "traitor". In this case, unlike Engels, the professor is not part of a different class and exists more as a faulty tool than a class traitor.

Take this answer with a grain of salt though.

I am not yet educated enough to even attempt to answer your second question😇

[–] znsh@lemmygrad.ml 0 points 3 months ago

Thanks for the reply!