this post was submitted on 11 Feb 2025
1 points (100.0% liked)

[CLOSED] FediLore + Fedidrama

3180 readers
2 users here now

This community has been locked, please see the discussion here. The original sidebar contents can be found below:


***

# Rules

1. Any drama must be posted as an observer, you cannot post drama that you are involved with.
2. When posting screenshots of drama, you must obscure the identity of all the participants.
3. The poster must have a credible post and comment history before submitting a piece of history. This is to avoid sock-puppetry and witch hunts.

The usual instance-wide rules also apply.

***

Chronicle the life and tale of the fediverse (+ matrix)

Largely a sublemmy about capturing drama, from fediverse spanning drama to just lemmy drama.

Includes lore like how a instance got it's name, how an instance got defederated, how an admin got doxxed, fedihistory etc

(New) This sub's intentions is to an archive/newspaper, as in preferably don't get into fights with each other or the ppl featured in the drama

Tags: fediverse news, lemmy news, lemmyverse

Partners:

* [midwest.social/c/Fediverse](https://midwest.social/c/fediverse)
* [Sub promo](https://lemmy.ca/c/communitypromo)
* [Fedizens](https://lemmy.ca/c/fedizens)

The original community icon is here

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Auction: https://www.sav.com/auctions/details/7073489/hexbear.net

Not sure what will happen, but seems to be a Fediverselore event for sure

Update: post from hexbear admin on chapo.chat: https://chapo.chat/post/4468531

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's important for Leftists to take an internationalist stance, so as to avoid perpetuating Imperialism like PatSocs seek to.

As for sources on numbers in different niches, I don't think there are hard numbers we can look at outside of viewing which tendencies have had the most traction and widest impact historically, which is currently Marxism-Leninism, especially if we include the CPC and assume a good chunk of its 96 million members are Marxist-Leninists.

I don't know what point you're trying to make about the Soviets with respect to "killing millions" or "banning opposition" outside of what I said, you aren't really pointing at specifics so there's nothing for me to respond to, other than to say the Black Book of Communism has long been debunked.

As for the Soviets, power was dramatically equalized, especially compared to Tsarist Russia and the Russian Federation. For Stalin, the CIA didn't think him a dictator. He certainly held a lot of power, but he wasn't unaccountable nor was he the one making all of the decisions. Same with Kruschev. That doesn't mean no Soviet leader has made mistakes, or had self-interested intentions, but at the same time you are taking an ahistorical, dogmatic view of the Soviet Union.

What you describe, with your heavy progressive tax rates, has only ever been in place in countries fearing a revolution while neighboring a Socialist power, historically the USSR. It's one thing to think a system would be nice, it's another thing entirely to shift towards it. Moreover, without addressing Capitalism, your "decentralization" is just an attempt to break up industry and keep Capitalism going a bit longer, like cutting your arm so it never fully heals.

Back to the Communists, I don't genuinely understand who you would support, it seems you let perfect be an enemy of good, which is just nihilism and passive support for the status quo.

Oh, you answered it in your next paragraph. It's no wonder you hold western-centric views, support for the Nordics makes that clear. The Nordics fund their safety nets through brutal loans and export of Capital, a process identified and tracked as Imperialism. They essentially function as landlords in country-form, expropriating far more value from sheer ownership of Capital than they actually produce, it's a form of usury. These Safety Nets are declining (as you yourself are noticing) because the Soviets are no longer right next door, pressuring the Capitalists in your country to offer concessions. That's why the Nordics are eroding.

I think a big part of your worldview is thinking the Nordics separate from US Imperialism, and not willing accomplices to the looting of the Global South. It might hurt, but you should look into the IMF and how Western Europe and the US work together to serve as global landlords, backed by the US's millitary and NATO membership as essentially a protection racket.

[–] Akuji@leminal.space 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

For Stalin, the CIA didn't think him a dictator.

I'm once again nitpicking on this because it prodigiously bothers me: the CIA collected and compiled comments from an informant. This is the nature of the document you have linked, not their opinion on the matter, not a statement from them, nothing of the sort.
Please, you have a bunch of books from reputable historians to mention and take quotes from, stop using this "unevaluated" information report as a proof of the CIA thinking this or that.

Edit:
Here's what they had to say about "stalinism" two years after the linked report in an analysis (Titoism and Soviet Communism):

This term is used to denote the teachings of Marx, Engels and Lenin as dogmatically interpreted by Stalin, and as imposed by him on the International Communist Movement.
The term denotes in particular the theory and practice connected with Stalin's personal dictatorship -- "one man rule" -- over the CPSU, the Soviet State, and -- under the guise of "the leading role" of the CPSU -- over the International Communist Movement as a whole.

As a matter of fact, the CIA did think him a dictator at the time.

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago

People don't generally read books even if I link them unless they are already interested in what I have to say. I could link Losurdo's Stalin: The History and Critique of a Black Legend if I wanted to share an objective critique of the man that neither glorifies nor demonizes him, or I could link sources on how the USSR was run so the term "dictator" doesn't make sense, but barely anyone would read them.

The CIA's later report seems to more be the "official line" rather than genuine analysis IMO.