this post was submitted on 09 Sep 2025
0 points (NaN% liked)

Anarchism

4716 readers
1 users here now

Are you an Anarchist? The answer might surprise you!

Rules: 0. Post content that is thoughtful and relevant to social liberation from an anarchist, autonomous, antifascist perspective.

  1. Be respectful
  2. Don't be a nazi
  3. Argue about the point and not the person
  4. This is not the place to debate the merits of anarchism itself. While discussion is encouraged, getting in your “epic dunks on the anarkiddies” is not. As a result of the instance’s poor moderation policies and hostility toward anarchists by default, lemmygrad users are encouraged not to post here, though not explicitly disallowed if they aren’t just looking to start a fight.

See also:

founded 7 years ago
MODERATORS
whydudothatdrcrane@lemmy.ml
rockroach@lemmy.ml
0
Wanted: Anarchists Who Won't Grow Up (www.patreon.com)
submitted 10 months ago by ChanceHappening@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/anarchism@lemmy.ml
51 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

It's pretty clearly hinting at those who would use the state to uplift the working class, making way for the gradual withering of the state alongside class, ie Marxists. It also directly talks about centralization, ie collectivizing production in the hands of all of society, a distinctly Marxist viewpoint.

[–] ChanceHappening@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Central governments aren't the exclusive domain of Marxists. There's zero mention of using the state to uplift anyone. Holy moley the projection.

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

The bit about centralizing all power in a single authority is pretty much the standard punch against Marxists. Having a central government is different from centralizing all of production. Secondly, there's this part:

The centralization of power in a single authority not only undermines individual autonomy but also infantilizes the very individuals it purports to protect. By relegating people to a subordinate status as dependents of the state, these systems strip them of agency and responsibility, suggesting that ordinary workers are incapable of making their own decisions

What is this supposed to be attacking other than the notion that a proletarian state can be used to uplift the proletariat?

[–] ChanceHappening@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

What is this supposed to be attacking

creepy authoritarian scumfucks who spend their lives fellating boots and cry victim when you suggest that maybe boots don't taste that good..?

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Why are you trying to dance around?

[–] ChanceHappening@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

i'm telling you exactly what you want to hear to end this tedious exchange. too bad the mod decided me talking about the unappealing flavor of boots is somehow 'bigotry'. this place is worse than reddit.

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

You were free to stop responding whenever you felt like.

[–] ChanceHappening@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

you use the word 'free' loosely for someone using a site where bootlicker is considered an unacceptable slur

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 0 points 10 months ago

Are the "authoritarian" mods requiring you to reply to me?