this post was submitted on 02 Sep 2025
1 points (100.0% liked)
World News
3303 readers
27 users here now
founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
It really pisses me off that anyone says this. If anything, the reality on the ground should mean there is fighting against this
This is an idealist position. Pursuing progressive social policy beyond what the public demands is not the priority for any revolutionary movement. We are talking about a country where al Qaeda controls half of the territory. The fact is that LGBTQ identities are seen as western decadence by many people in the global south.
The criteria for success for the revolution is whether they can consolidate political power or not. Everything else is secondary. How long did it take Cuba to come around?
That doesn't justify bigotry and persecution, and the 1950's were a much less progressive and educated time on topics like this.
I should point out that Al-Qaeda's beliefs are in the same category as the supposed revolutionary government's, and it's because of shit like this that neoliberals run with the claim that communists hate LGBT people. You can't call yourself a revolutionary and support this fascist horseshit.
It's not idealist when people's lives are at stake, you tool.