this post was submitted on 18 Jul 2025
735 points (99.2% liked)

News

37146 readers
3224 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] scytale@lemmy.zip 37 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Yeah I didn’t really enjoy prim and proper corporate Colbert. His show was pretty mediocre. I believe it was also his decision to step away from his original persona and move on to a standard talk show host, so he actually wanted that change. Ferguson is still the GOAT for me.

[–] Wfh@lemmy.zip 11 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I miss Craig Ferguson so much!

[–] boydster@sh.itjust.works 8 points 9 months ago (2 children)

I thought it was because Comedy Central had a claimed trademark or something regarding the character he played, but it's been a while so I might be misremembering

[–] ohulancutash@feddit.uk 11 points 9 months ago (1 children)

He didn’t want to mix the Colbert character with the Late Night show.

[–] boydster@sh.itjust.works 5 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Irrelevant and refuted by Colbert's own words, but ok. Viacom quite literally wouldn't allow it.

https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/general-news/stephen-colbert-colbert-report-character-915236/

But on Wednesday night’s Late Show, the real Stephen Colbert indicated that Comedy Central’s legal team is barring his old character from appearing on CBS.

“This is true, immediately after that show, CBS’ top lawyer was contacted by the top lawyer for another company to say that the character Stephen Colbert is their intellectual property,” the real Stephen Colbert said on Wednesday.

He continued, “So it is with a heavy heart that I announce that thanks to corporate lawyers, the character Stephen Colbert, host of The Colbert Report, will never be seen again.”

The audience began to boo but the Late Show host insisted there was nothing he could do.

“I feel the same way, but what can I do? The lawyers have spoken. I cannot reasonably argue I own my face or name,” he said. “And as much as I’d like to have that guy on again, I can’t.”

[–] ohulancutash@feddit.uk 0 points 9 months ago

That refers to a bit he did with the Colbert character over a year into the run of the show. He has said in various interviews that he chose not to do the Late Show in any character because he felt he’d done that and it would be disrespectful to the franchise.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

No way CBS would have allowed him to do the show in that character... Maybe a segment every now and then, but not entire episodes. Not on CBS.

[–] boydster@sh.itjust.works 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

He quite literally was legally disallowed by Viacom (Comedy Central' owners). Not CBS, where he told the audience he would love to bring the character back but was not legally allowed to do.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 9 months ago

It wouldn't have been the entire show.