this post was submitted on 20 Apr 2025
2 points (100.0% liked)

Greentext

8305 readers
1165 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ocean@lemmy.selfhostcat.com 1 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Can someone explain the diff

[–] Eyekaytee@aussie.zone 2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

from the other site:

Creepy is mostly men, wet is mostly women.

When it's mostly men you're just one of many (men) and only the truely creepy guys are considered creepy.

The higher the ratio of women the lower the bar for creepiness drops.

If your gym is very wet just looking around might already be considered creepy. Rules 1 and 2 apply.

[–] Not_Dav3@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

Rules 1 and 2 apply.

  1. Be attractive.
  2. Don't be unattractive.

?

[–] AI_toothbrush@lemmy.zip 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Isnt wet wet because women can sometimes release some bodily fluids when they are struggling, for example in the gym?

[–] JustAnotherKay@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] AI_toothbrush@lemmy.zip 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ok but women sometimes pee themselves because of certain anatomical differences when working out. Idk if thats what "wet" was trying to convey tho

[–] JustAnotherKay@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

I would imagine that "wet" has more to do with the sexual degradation of women, viewing them only as the "wetness" of their vaginal cavity and not as people. Considering the source, of course

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Apparently a creepy gym is mostly men and a wet gym is mostly women.

[–] ocean@lemmy.selfhostcat.com 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That’s a weird way to describe the latter

[–] dumbass@leminal.space -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's 4chan, wtf did you expect?

[–] ocean@lemmy.selfhostcat.com 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Intellectual discussion of course!

[–] SacralPlexus@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

I think you misspelled incellectual.