Fuck AI

7166 readers

2386 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

VerbFlow@lemmy.world

MrMcGasion@lemmy.world

TootSweet@lemmy.world

BigMikeInAustin@lemmy.world

cynar@lemmy.world

drmeanfeel@lemmy.world

pavnilschanda@lemmy.world

CriticalMedicine@lemmy.world

WonderfulWanderer@lemmy.world

Communist@lemmy.ml

eatCasserole@lemmy.world

SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world

NutWrench@lemmy.world

Soup@lemmy.cafe

iAvicenna@lemmy.world

Tinks@lemmy.world

wizblizz@lemmy.world

corus_kt@lemmy.world

Prandom_returns@lemm.ee

TrickDacy@lemmy.world

TheFriar@lemm.ee

HawlSera@lemm.ee

andrew_bidlaw@sh.itjust.works

MeDuViNoX@sh.itjust.works

33550336@lemmy.world

Nougat@fedia.io

Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world

Quill7513@slrpnk.net

glowing_hans@sopuli.xyz

e8d79@discuss.tchncs.de

ThefuzzyFurryComrade@pawb.social

175

Anthropic can legally train AI on books without authors permission, judge rules (cybernews.com)

submitted 11 months ago by Noerknhar@feddit.org to c/fuck_ai@lemmy.world

37 comments fedilink hide all child comments

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/32347293

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] ParadoxSeahorse@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

“Derivative” is less questionable than “work”.

For eg. AI Gen imagery is not copyrightable for the most part, legally closer to plagiarism than art?

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 1 points 11 months ago

Derivative describes what happened to the copyrighted work, not what slop was churned out by it.

If the plagiarism is far enough from the original work, it isn't protected by the original copyright.