znonymous

joined 2 years ago
[–] znonymous@hexbear.net 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Is that the weird green house from the Netflix show The OA?

[–] znonymous@hexbear.net 0 points 2 months ago

Every single time I get the rare chance to witness someone trying to organize more than ten people to do anything vaguely political, like talk about taking concrete steps to stop our government from unaliving children in other countries, it is plain how incredibly difficult the resulting onslaught of naysayers and argumentative donothings is.

I wish I knew what to say. I wish I could do what you are doing. But I have some truly insane circumstances that make fulfilling my responsibilities to my family feel truly overwhelming. So I can't even begin to consider working on an organizational project.

[–] znonymous@hexbear.net 1 points 3 months ago

What version of unblock origin are you using? I find simply updating to the latest version solves issues like this.

[–] znonymous@hexbear.net 2 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Can you link to the video in question? Have you temporarily disabled your adblock plugin, to confirm that the problem is an anti-adblock function of the video player page?

 

My family just rolls their eyes at me at this point.

 

As a citizen of the United States, it has become clear that I suffer from a debilitating deficit of historical and ideological education.

As I wrestle with the obstacles of understanding, comprehending, deprogramming, and learning how to identify the ubiquitous propaganda coming from my country's institutions, I am struck by the extreme detachment of our citizens from our humanity -- especially when it comes to our collective unity as human beings, and communities.

Our fracturing hyper-individuality is an obvious mental illness that our rulers are clearly pleased to cultivate.

In that environment, I find that engaging with people, even lifelong friends and family about political topics is practically impossible, because disagreements are entrenched and endless due to fundamental ideological differences. Some, who consider themselves "centrist" or "above it all", refuse to engage with political topics altogether, or are even completely disengaged from politics of any sort.

I personally find that to be a paradox and impossible, since even a refusal to participate in politics or such conversations is itself a ideological political stance -- of passive, tacit approval of the status quo. Nevertheless, I've discovered that it seems nearly impossible to convince even people who claim to be "there for you" or "friends" or "family" that organization against the ruling class is necessary through direct action, community building, and advocacy against systemic injustice in this country.

For me, the challenge is not just in effectively communicating the complexity of the issues involved (which includes trying to undo years of effective brainwashing, of myself and conversation partners), but also in the emotional investment that these topics require. It is painful to witness the resistance to acknowledging systemic injustices, as it forces individuals to confront uncomfortable truths about not just their privilege and complicity in sustaining the status quo -- but often times even their very identity -- which is effectively mired in the tribalism and nationalism deliberately cultivated by colonizers and imperialists.

Attempts to articulate the importance of unity and collective action often feel like shouting into a void, met with defensiveness or, worse yet, apathy.

Even among allies, ideological differences sow discord, but among the unconverted, it seems pretty much impossible.

What should I study? What should I read? Are there ways through such problems from within such a toxic culture?

 

I hesitate to add more context to this question lest I taint the responses. Seeking to learn more about jurisprudence theory from materialist perspectives.

By legal positivism I mean the idea that validity of laws are derived solely from their formal sources (statutes or judicial decisions), not on any moral content. I'm curious how, from a materialist standpoint, positivism accounts for the social -‑ and economic -- power structures that actually shape which rules get made and enforced. Specifically, in the West, especially in the UK, Australia, and the USA. What do you think? Also, have Marxist-Leninist writers had much to say on the subject?

 

This person seems to be the boogie-man that Zionists are pointing at these days to explain why today's Palestinians are the actual Nazis, not Zionists themselves. What's the materialist response for this smearing and conflating of today's besieged Palestinians with this one guy?

 

Title

 

Right now I'm looking at UNRWA: https://donate.unrwa.org/int/en/general

(Not sure I trust my local -- US -- website.)

I have previously been sending my donations to MSF: https://give.doctorswithoutborders.org/campaign/675296/donate

What do you think, Chapo?