v_pp

joined 5 years ago
[–] v_pp@lemmygrad.ml 0 points 2 weeks ago

Get organized. Join a party, if there isn't a formation near you then create one. You will find comrades, and you will become more politically developed.

[–] v_pp@lemmygrad.ml 0 points 3 weeks ago

I think because they weren't directly participating in the attacks on Iran like the others were

[–] v_pp@lemmygrad.ml 0 points 1 month ago

I feel like I should clarify, though, that this isn't their actual political ideology. It's just a useful shorthand, but they do actually have principled anti-imperialist politics.

[–] v_pp@lemmygrad.ml 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Do you go to a public school? And have you considered just attending class anyway and forcing the issue? I suspect they are hoping to make all these issues quietly disappear, but that plan depends on your cooperation.

[–] v_pp@lemmygrad.ml 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] v_pp@lemmygrad.ml 0 points 2 months ago

Why would they do that

[–] v_pp@lemmygrad.ml 0 points 7 months ago (2 children)

The film was made by a Latvian guy, who is a politician in this, uhh... party: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Alliance_(Latvia)

[–] v_pp@lemmygrad.ml 0 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

So what I'm hearing is that the Chinese are better at calculus than the Americans, sounds about right.

Although the article doesn't get into any detail, it sounds like what they're doing is applying similar optimization techniques to those that have enabled the past 15 years of AI/ML development in order to optimize their aircraft design. It's not surprising that China was able to do that; there's been an enormous amount of work into developing math, software, and hardware for that stuff. But what's more surprising is that the US hasn't implemented it already. I guess the X-47B program was halted right as the ML/deep learning explosion started so these teqniques weren't really widespread yet. But I find it hard to believe that the US hasn't done it already.

[–] v_pp@lemmygrad.ml 0 points 10 months ago

Are you too stupid to recognize the contradiction in your own position?

[–] v_pp@lemmygrad.ml 0 points 10 months ago (3 children)

Consequently, people who are infertile do not have a sex? You are just demonstrating the point: that your attempts to define "biological sex" are faulty. People who recognize this fact are not denying reality; you are.