subignition

joined 2 years ago
[–] subignition@fedia.io 2 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Wow, it's almost like that's an obvious and fundamental limitation of the technology or something.

It's darkly funny that they are plainly giving up the game here while seemingly not getting it at all. Of course LLMs can't be better than the data they're trained to imitate in the first place. That's not news. Just about any layperson who's experienced science fiction in the last fifty years could have told you: If you want to create something more intelligent than humans, you need some mechanism of introspection that allows the system to refine and improve itself with minimal outside intervention. Some kind of artificially created... what was the word again... oh, yeah. Intelligence.

[–] subignition@fedia.io 3 points 17 hours ago

Plot twist: you are the little spoon and you're trying to wash yourself

[–] subignition@fedia.io 5 points 17 hours ago

question your assumption that you need to respond in the first place. You have no obligation to spend your energy on the "troll or functionally illiterate person" coin flip. to put it another way...

What I want is to say something that quickly quarantines the misreading comment in people's minds so the misreading doesn't infect the entire thread.

if for the sake of example we ignore the possibility that your writing actually was unclear or ambiguous, then for the misreading to "infect the entire thread", the other readers would have to have similarly poor reading comprehension, right? that or they're putting little enough effort in not to catch the original response being way off base. if that's the case, is it really that important how you are perceived?

[–] subignition@fedia.io 7 points 18 hours ago

This is like 80% accurate yeah

[–] subignition@fedia.io 15 points 1 day ago

To shreds, you say?

[–] subignition@fedia.io 60 points 1 day ago (3 children)

this is exactly why dr. doofenshmirtz and professor farnsworth should have collaborated to invent the "slap poster in the face over the internet button"

shame is dead for the most part in pseudonymous spaces but people would be a lot more considerate if there were some actual consequences

[–] subignition@fedia.io 8 points 4 days ago

Me in the club at 2 AM, snorting clench

[–] subignition@fedia.io 18 points 1 week ago (3 children)

well, that article disagrees with you though. That "feature" is only going to do anything to Windows installations.

Also, OS doesn't matter if it's a bios update.

The ASUS UEFI firmware exposes an ACPI table to Windows 10, called "WPBT" or "Windows Platform Binary Table". WPBT is used in the pre-built OEM industry, and is referred to as "the Vendor's Rootkit." Put simply, it is a script that makes Windows copy data from the BIOS to the System32 folder on the machine and execute it during Windows startup - every single time the system is booted.

also, https://github.com/Jamesits/dropWPBT

[–] subignition@fedia.io 2 points 1 week ago

The rules don't say the headline needs to be funny, just that it needs to be plausibly mistaken for The Onion.

There is quite a spectrum of "This is just depressing enough that I'm not sure it's real" these days

[–] subignition@fedia.io 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Let's hope your username doesn't become relevant.

[–] subignition@fedia.io 4 points 2 weeks ago

The entire pedestal the cube is on comes through the blue portal and the cube slides to the floor

[–] subignition@fedia.io 1 points 3 weeks ago

Give them a little credit, they were only five lines away from a bullseye in their second example. That's much closer to accurate than their overall comprehension of my post was

 

No, seriously. A lot of the time after I use one, it results in some kind of mess with varying degrees of subtlety. It's been mildly irritating for years and I'm starting to feel like I'm missing something obvious.

Are you supposed to aim toward the center? To one side? High? Low? Into the drain/water?

I've tried aiming near the side so that the stream hits the urinal quietly and has a low angle of deflection, thinking it'll minimize splash back. But sometimes it seems like there are tiny droplets in a radius around the stream and some flecks will get onto the outside of the urinal, which is no good.

I've tried aiming at the deepest part in the back of the urinal, hoping that the intense splashing from hitting it at close to a 90-degree angle will be counterbalanced by the greatest amount of surrounding urinal surface in the vicinity, but this is too optimistic and tends to deposit a fine mist on the floor between me and my target.

I've tried aiming downwards at the drain, or when it's the style of urinal with a standing water level, at the back half of the water where it's shallow. This is loudest and probably provokes silent judgment from anyone else unfortunate enough to be using the bathroom at the same time as me, but it doesn't seem to be especially good at minimizing mess and in the case of standing water, has a low chance of splashing an actually threatening amount of liquid back in my direction.

Perhaps it's just inevitable that this particular plumbing fixture comes with a little mess involved. In other areas of life we are fine with periodically cleaning in our Sisyphean struggles against the various avenues where dirt and grime accumulate. But I want to be a conscientious user of shared facilities, damn it. And there's only so many times a guy can discreetly wipe off his shoe with a paper towel before going insane.

Please help.

 

https://lemmy.world/post/25206083

edit: changed image links to embeds Modlog 1 Modlog 2 Modlog 3 Modlog 4

view more: next ›