sqw

joined 3 years ago
[–] sqw@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 1 week ago

is it more obtuse

[–] sqw@lemmy.sdf.org 10 points 1 week ago (2 children)

me with gamechanger recently

[–] sqw@lemmy.sdf.org 0 points 1 week ago

really sound off about it. let loose, it's rant.

[–] sqw@lemmy.sdf.org 0 points 1 week ago

if you're attempting murder without the crow pun context we're gonna need to call the real police

[–] sqw@lemmy.sdf.org 0 points 1 month ago

ah , seems my client has some helpful shortcuts

cool ~stuff.~

[–] sqw@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 month ago (2 children)

where's the reference for these?

[–] sqw@lemmy.sdf.org 18 points 1 month ago

this is one that i directly appreciated. the transparent bottom-line pricing was refreshing.

[–] sqw@lemmy.sdf.org 0 points 1 month ago

https://youtu.be/fYAugzaT5gI

here's a take. i think her story was this was basically tried a bunch of times from both sides of the aisle and finally made it, and makes some kind of overall economic sense, despite the rotten branding.

my first thought was that it could be something like a stochastic grift, funneling defaulted money from latent accounts into the banks.

bigger picture it seems like a way to try and distract from support of, or privatize/individualize social security

[–] sqw@lemmy.sdf.org 0 points 1 month ago

https://youtu.be/fYAugzaT5gI

here's a take. i think her story was this was basically tried a bunch of times from both sides of the aisle and finally made it, and makes some kind of overall economic sense, despite the rotten branding.

my first thought was that it could be something like a stochastic grift, funneling defaulted money from latent accounts into the banks.

bigger picture it seems like a way to try and distract from support of, or privatize/individualize social security

[–] sqw@lemmy.sdf.org 40 points 1 month ago

if it causes even one eight year old to take an interest, it's worth it.

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
view more: next ›