oblomov

joined 4 years ago
[–] oblomov@sociale.network 8 points 1 month ago (2 children)

@scruiser there's no winning with these guys. I had a similar experience with someone bringing up South Korea as an example of country that brought itself up by its bootstraps via unfettered capitalism because “planned economy doesn't work”, so I had to remind them that SK was a military dictatorship who implemented 5-year plans leveraging billions of foreign investment that was given to it by US to prop it up against NK.

[–] oblomov@sociale.network 8 points 1 month ago (7 children)

@scruiser @BlueMonday1984 funny how they mock left wingers for «that wasn't real communism» and then come up with the same excuses for liberal democracies and capitalism whenever one points out all the shit that came out of that. It's really ALWAYS projection with them, isn't it?

[–] oblomov@sociale.network 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

@kathsone @macfranc @fediverso sono pronto a scommettere, pur essendo stato abbastanza assente in questi ultimi giorni, che posso indovinare almeno una delle istanze coinvolte al primo colpo.

[–] oblomov@sociale.network 0 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

@anarchiversitario @politica ricordiamo peraltro che nei Paesi come l'Uganda le recenti leggi che criminalizzano l'omosessualità sono frutto pesantemente di cristianissmi “gruppi di pressione” statunitensi
https://www.msnbc.com/opinion/msnbc-opinion/uganda-anti-lgbtq-bill-rcna76630
con le stesse radici evangeliche che oggi si trovano lí al potere e stanno smantellando, oltre alle fragili conquiste LGBTQ+, anche i diritti delle donne eterosessuali (aborto, divorzio)

[–] oblomov@sociale.network 0 points 7 months ago

@giorgiosarto @news l'incontro serve a passare le mazzette?

[–] oblomov@sociale.network 0 points 9 months ago

@anarchiversitario @politica intendeva un miliardo di danni

[–] oblomov@sociale.network 0 points 9 months ago

@anarchiversitario @politica è il momento di usare le opere d'arte come assorbenti e pannolini, per poi rivendere il tutto come #ArteModerna

 

A curious math problem I came up with: given a target, what's the fewest digits an integer must have (in a given base) to contain all integers from 0 to the target, as substrings?

http://wok.oblomov.eu/mathesis/number-substrings/

@mathematics @math@lemmy.ml @math@kbin.social

e.g. for a target of 19 a candidate representative would be 1011213141516171819 in base 10, that has 19 digits. Can it be done in less, or is $\sigma_10(19) = 19$?
Can we find a general rule? Any properties of this function?

#math #maths #numberTheory #combinatorics