nucleative

joined 2 years ago
[–] nucleative@lemmy.world 3 points 19 hours ago

As someone who's been in immigration offices in other countries, it can indeed get considerably worse. I think it's the first mandate of government offices worldwide: suck as much as possible

[–] nucleative@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

Unfortunately that is almost certainly detectable too

[–] nucleative@lemmy.world 0 points 3 days ago

Do you feel like AI and its current form is ever going to go away?

To me it seems like we're well beyond the point of it going away ever. It may never live up to the hype of replacing all the jobs.

We also know that AI companies are footing a large chunk of the bill. Someday those prices are going to crank up and a bunch of work we shovel over to AI will go back to humans.

Heck, it may have peaked already - we may not have any more killer uses to discover. Or maybe we do, and that's partly why I'm here - I'm pretty interested to see if some interesting uses cases emerge. Some really tough or annoying problem that we all hate to do that AI can start actually doing really good work at.

[–] nucleative@lemmy.world -2 points 3 days ago (2 children)

AI is the buzz at the moment and is driving investment. From the perspective of the business of selling tech it matters most.

But that's largely because companies involved in tech are trying to find use cases for AI that can move the needle, as is the case for many new technologies in search of a problem to solve.

If the starting position is "fuckai" or "fuckwork", or "fuckzuck", well I guess thats awesome but doesn't really seem like a conversation about tech or how it may eventually solve problems or change the world.

[–] nucleative@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

Two companies that are desperate for disruption. It's like one drowning person swimming over to another drowning person to rescue.

[–] nucleative@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago

All the ma and pa shops were forced into selling on Walmart and Amazon and eBay etc.

They are equally beat to shit by the platform pushing their prices down, the platform controlling the visibility of their products, and countless rules that if ever broken result in a permanent platform ban, ending the business.

[–] nucleative@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Is there any insider info on the micro transactions we're gonna see in GTA6 online?

The shark cards thing was a freaking racket for Rockstar so there's no way we don't see that again.

At certain points it was not fun to play online if you didn't have certain assets because you'd get spawn raped over and over by punks who obviously had too much grinding time or too much cash to burn.

I'd have no problem dropping $80 if that was under control and I could expect a fun balanced experience even if I can play just a couple times a week.

If it's going to be pay to win, better make it a free client with an unlockable story mode or something.

[–] nucleative@lemmy.world 28 points 1 week ago

When you're borrowing money to service the debt, things can get spicy

[–] nucleative@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Oooh, don't fall asleep with these on!

[–] nucleative@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Craigslist, or Facebook marketplace?

[–] nucleative@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

Um... don't we all just assume Trump got some bad news on the negotiations, decided he'd rather missle the opposing party and just ordered the strike in a rage?

Afterwards, like the true nincompoop he is, decided to justify as if it was some kind of real plan.

Then I'm sure he just assumed he could "win" the negotiation by threatening further violence.

Just imagine working for this fucktard and now, reflecting on this string of events, realizing that this is why we have guards as nightclubs to prevent drunken brawls like this, and your boss is nothing more than a weak, incompetent mobster surrounded by people who just want a snort of whatever the fuck he's sniffing under the desk.

 

Today I set up a little project website on a new subdomain. It's not a www subdomain or a newly registered domain, which is easy to detect. We're talking about:

Randomchars.mydomain.com

Within 20 minutes, the anthropic ClaudeBot was on it. I could tell because the nginx access log showed a hit to robots.txt and then a handful of pages.

First off, how the hell did they find it? Next, is my DNS provider, Amazon Route 53 selling this kind of data now? Or is there some kind of DNS wildcard query?

 

I came across this article in another Lemmy community that dislikes AI. I'm reposting instead of cross posting so that we could have a conversation about how "work" might be changing with advancements in technology.

The headline is clickbaity because Altman was referring to how farmers who lived decades ago might perceive that the work "you and I do today" (including Altman himself), doesn't look like work.

The fact is that most of us work far abstracted from human survival by many levels. Very few of us are farming, building shelters, protecting our families from wildlife, or doing the back breaking labor jobs that humans were forced to do generations ago.

In my first job, which was IT support, the concept was not lost on me that all day long I pushed buttons to make computers beep in more friendly ways. There was no physical result to see, no produce to harvest, no pile of wood being transitioned from a natural to a chopped state, nothing tangible to step back and enjoy at the end of the day.

Bankers, fashion designers, artists, video game testers, software developers and countless other professions experience something quite similar. Yet, all of these jobs do in some way add value to the human experience.

As humanity's core needs have been met with technology requiring fewer human inputs, our focus has been able to shift to creating value in less tangible, but perhaps not less meaningful ways. This has created a more dynamic and rich life experience than any of those previous farming generations could have imagined. So while it doesn't seem like the work those farmers were accustomed to, humanity has been able to shift its attention to other types of work for the benefit of many.

I postulate that AI - as we know it now - is merely another technological tool that will allow new layers of abstraction. At one time bookkeepers had to write in books, now software automatically encodes accounting transactions as they're made. At one time software developers might spend days setting up the framework of a new project, and now an LLM can do the bulk of the work in minutes.

These days we have fewer bookkeepers - most companies don't need armies of clerks anymore. But now we have more data analysts who work to understand the information and make important decisions. In the future we may need fewer software coders, and in turn, there will be many more software projects that seek to solve new problems in new ways.

How do I know this? I think history shows us that innovations in technology always bring new problems to be solved. There is an endless reservoir of challenges to be worked on that previous generations didn't have time to think about. We are going to free minds from tasks that can be automated, and many of those minds will move on to the next level of abstraction.

At the end of the day, I suspect we humans are biologically wired with a deep desire to output rewarding and meaningful work, and much of the results of our abstracted work is hard to see and touch. Perhaps this is why I enjoy mowing my lawn so much, no matter how advanced robotic lawn mowing machines become.

 

Saw this come through from Octoprint remotely. It was an 8 hour print and died about at about the 7:15 mark.

view more: next ›