Anything where a trustless system is important. The "largest users can rewrite history at will" is a critique to specific implementations, not Blockchain.
migo
joined 2 years ago
Just read your own meme post
I get your argument but from that to being a Zionist (or a Nazi, same thing) is a stretch and one that destroys critical thinking and leftist constructive discussion.
Sure, so you're calling everyone that is trying to make people's lives better within the confines of the inherently oppressive system a Zionist. Sure, makes perfect sense.
Whether we like it or not, AI is and will be a significant part of the economic infrastructure. The public must own AI like we should own roads, rail, and other strategic infrastructure that we use for our economic activity.
Of course nationalizing is the right course of action. Seeing so called communists arguing against seizing the means of production is mind boggling.
Lebensraum - these Nazis are all about it
Huh, that's not my case at all, I run everything from the home folder with my user
My answer: if we're sat the point that you don't even understand the definitions of sex, gender and sexuality I don't think we have the time to discuss this. Ultimately, regardless of definitions, we should treat humans as humans and be kind to one another.
Por favor empilhar as cadeiras no fim do dia (passive voice) Por favor empilhe as cadeiras no fim do dia (imperative)
Portuguese
Love simplex, also good if you have children and they have a tablet but not a phone
No, we don't. Maybe in Poland or Hungary it's different. After all who voted Orban would also vote Trump
view more: next ›
Well, you just don't know. In the real world there are private blockchains between equipotent participants that don't rely on burning the planet to function. Helpful reading: https://www.geeksforgeeks.org/ethical-hacking/private-blockchain/
Blockchain is a concept, can't be owned or affected.