Competition is good and the more Windows tries to meet this promise, the more Linux gets exposure.
joshcodes
joined 2 years ago
Yeah they'll drop this as soon as they realise The Dreaded Kali Linux Hacker OS System is open source tbh. First cyber attack, they'll realise they didnt know the owner of the malicious device's age, cry on TV then amend the law to include it.
Meanwhile the number of school shootings will remain the same, foster care systems will be underfunded, but the children will be rendered safe.
Remind me, if everyone is a child until proven otherwise as implemented by discord etc, are they still allowed to collect my data when I dont age verify? Can I sue them for collecting what could have been a toddlers information as they couldn't possibly have known I wasn't one?
Its all so fucking stupid.
Dynamic programming is a headfuck when you first learn it, they're obviously just a superior being.
Our service desk were forbidden from moving over on release because new outlook can't modify the subject of an email, so we couldn't add ticket numbers. They've been using this feature since outlook was released.
I did some reading on forums and thousands of people rely on this feature and noticed it missing. Not sure if its been added yet because I still use "classic".
I know this with the text "mess with the pope, get the no-scope"
Is it worth your reaching out to the EFF? It sounds like you may like to work with them. Granted, I dont know if they have much to do with Europe or if they're just a US thing.
Also possible you've discussed this somewhere. I'm just an advocate for pooling knowledge and resources.
It was the British and they didnt burn it to the ground so I'm not sure why people think thats what happened. It was a retaliation attack for the US fighting in Canada, sure. But they weren't Canadian troops.
They didnt burn it to the ground because the building burnt too fast for them to get the fire hot enough. The outer walls and bits inside were still standing. I believe the British even ate dinner in the house because the chef had prepared it for the president or something but I couldn't find a source for that.
Sydney and Melbourne have pretty good public transport. Unfortunately they're compensating for everywhere else, which has some truly fucking awful public transport. Looking at Adelaide in particular but I know others are also shit.
Nuclear is the most expensive energy solution, the hardest to maintain and the worst possible outcome for human error. Solar panels can be easily installed and will generate some power most days of the year. Wind farms produce more energy altogether but run less often. Use both with batteries and you dont care if its sunny or not. Also, power grid? Energy is made somewhere and sent elsewhere. You can do this by putting solar where, on average, it is very sunny such as a desert and wind where it us windy, such as near the beach. Then you run power cables to your cities. The whole project would costs as much as like two nuclear facilities. Oh and nuclear takes like decades to build. You have to make Fukushima/Chernobyl before you can accidentally melt it down. That takes at least 5-10 years of investment. Or you could put the same money into solar and get energy within months...
Was going to say this, the cables are messed up
I mean, you want to go hard ball: our attorney general is who actually fired the prime minister and he was a CIA plant.
Transcription: picture is a screenshot of a user inbox page with a new message containing a photo of a woman with dark hair. The message reads "Hi I am Nicole but you can call me the Fediverse chick". There's more text but this is very obviously a bot attempting to get people to join a particular server.
On a side note: I can't delete this message as I get an error about dms not being available. I've blocked the bot already. Does programming.dev support dm's?
view more: next ›
Mining shills who want to spend $10b on concrete manufacturing and uranium mines.
What makes me laugh is that we could still invest that into mining, get the resources to make solar panels and batteries, then stop because battery recycling is a thing. They can still get rich off it. They just have a set period the mining is necessary while we get the amount required. But by then they could buy the solar farms and generate infinite income from the power generation... Are they all just bad at capitalism or something?