gressen

joined 3 years ago
[–] gressen@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago
[–] gressen@lemm.ee 18 points 1 year ago (6 children)

They should direct their concerns to the source of the issue - the ones that put UK in this predicament.

[–] gressen@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

Only around 40% Swiss households are in debt.

[–] gressen@lemm.ee 27 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)

Only thing missing is some garlic and fresh basil.

[–] gressen@lemm.ee 15 points 1 year ago (6 children)

Why is there Wikipedia logo in the pic?

[–] gressen@lemm.ee 47 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Pay to reject data consent? What kind of devil spawn is this?

https://archive.is/BaPz0

 
[–] gressen@lemm.ee 28 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Name the company that allows this. Everybody else would like to know who the offender is.

[–] gressen@lemm.ee 268 points 1 year ago (7 children)

The printer company is called Procolored.

[–] gressen@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Egipt might not like that.

[–] gressen@lemm.ee 22 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Flee where?

[–] gressen@lemm.ee 50 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This will be solved by defunding the research.

[–] gressen@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's not doable because it will eat away the profit margins. /s

 

In the screenshot you can see that there is currently one rising community overloading my post feed. I assume this is happening to many users. I understand that I can block the community but that's not really what I want. I think that this problem could be solved by introducing a mechanism to dynamically limit the number of such posts based on user preferences. For example I could set this community to appear less often and an algorithm could apply this preference to my feed order. I know that the proverbial algorithms used by major social networks are frowned upon. That happens for a good reason - they are opaque, proprietary and often show signs of bad intention. They are used for political and social influence, to silence opposing voices and a whole array of other nefarious goals like playing of people's fear, outrage, etc. The thing I'm suggesting would have to be transparent by design and fully optional. That's a social media "algorithm" I'd like to use. I'd like to hear what other people think about this idea.

view more: next ›