dragginupagain

'somebody at a security conference said one method of dealing with a target is destroying it'

wow incredible story. Surely this is being upvoted because it's a quality article about current events that are globally relevant and not because the musk obsessives are jerking off to the fantasy the headline presented.

There is an enough_musk_spam community where this stuff should be posted.

Here's the actual reporting that this clickbait was extracted from https://archive.ph/20260709102553/https://www.spiegel.de/international/world/the-new-axis-of-evil-der-spiegel-investigation-reveals-deep-military-cooperation-between-russia-and-china-a-12dc295a-413d-4a2f-b44f-2922092270e3#selection-1635.25-1635.374 fair warning it just boils down to 'Russia and China have some military cooperation because they see the US as a shared adversary'

Yes, when they realize being vegetarian is hypocritical. Or they aren't hypocrites because they don't care about animal suffering and they're doing it for environmental reasons or whatever.

That's because vegetarians are either hypocrites or don't care about animal suffering in the first place. Ideologically they have more in common with meat eaters than with vegans.

*stay mad, cheesebreath. Those are the only two options. Either they don't care about causing animal suffering for their lifestyle, or they claim to care and are hypocrites. 'animals shouldn't be killed for food, except for these foods' is a fundamentally hypocritical position.

It was already linked in the vice post.

You are really stupid dude. I'm not standing up for open AI, you are the only person standing up for a business. It's just the business is a clickbait farm.

You craving manufactured schadenfreude is not activism.

You're so based for standing up for the clickbait rag that is modern vice. Even if you have the reading comprehension of a grade schooler.

Ok and you put more thought into the framing of this story than the author of the vice post(I will not call that an article) did. If you think there isn't an anti-datacenter circlejerk and this wasn't bait for it I don't know what to tell you. High value cargo theft did not start because of datacenters, but you definitely only heard about this one because of the huge appetite for anti-datacenter news.

That's what I mean by circlejerk. Things that are not actually particularly exceptional are being treated like major news stories because people crave confirmation bias and schadenfreude. This vice post is one of the most transparent examples of the outrage economy that I've seen in a while.

Do you think pretending that thieves doing what they have always done is now epic and based is somehow hurting AI companies?

Clickbait circlejerk slop. Every construction site is a target for thieves. This is just low effort clickbait made to pander to the anti-datacenter circlejerk, you could at least have linked instead to the business insider article this is ripping off.

I'm ~~pretty~~ definitely sure the photo is AI too, it's certainly not the Muttsee dam.

'confirms the energy is there' buddy it's the sun, we already know it's there. It doesn't make sense to install capacity at 12 euros per watt when you can install capacity for 1 euro per watt or whatever the numbers actually are. I would be shocked if transmission losses are anywhere even close to cost efficiency losses.

The swiss do this sort of thing because they have the money to burn and place a high emphasis on aesthetics. They probably think this is less of an eyesore than ground mount so that makes it worth it for them.

I could have sworn I looked this up recently, I might have been thinking of Austria.

*oh that figure includes combustion heating, I think I saw their domestic electricity production mix.