cockmushroom

joined 7 months ago
[–] cockmushroom@reddthat.com 5 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (2 children)

The point is not that ∀s∈S∃f(s) and g(s) | f(s)∈[0,1] and g(s)∈[0,1], it's that ∀y∈[0,1]∃h(y)∈S

 

From a while ago but i posted in the wrong sub. I'd never sworn in front of it or anything.

[–] cockmushroom@reddthat.com 2 points 1 day ago (4 children)

It's posts like these that make me wish we had downvotes here.

[–] cockmushroom@reddthat.com 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Are you running dsp operations of some sort?

[–] cockmushroom@reddthat.com 3 points 1 week ago (3 children)

If you'd fleshed yhat out into an actual argument you'd likely have realized that you've no leg to stand on.

The only way that carries over for a conparison, regardless of your conclusion/evaluation is if the numerator (the total amount of income) is larger for men than it is for women such that the denominator (the number of people in the partition) cannot make up the difference. If you've got six pears and your parents have twelve, then you're equal on pears. If you've 6 lemons and they've 20, they each have almost 2 lemons for every single one you have. Ratios are designed for meaningful relative comparisons given that the dimensions/units on both sides of the relation agree. Their rational components are not.

[–] cockmushroom@reddthat.com 1 points 1 week ago

Thanks for taking the time! If you're still up for making recommendations, i'd appreciate them!

[–] cockmushroom@reddthat.com 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

I don't know what you mean ...

i'm asking if it can be described as such and what people think about doing so. Not really intending to describe anything more than necessary for articulating the questions.

Regardless of the attitude of any individual, the structure of society is white supremacist

Totally agree with this!

[–] cockmushroom@reddthat.com 1 points 3 weeks ago

Not exactly, i'm asking if such definitions are examples of what they ostensibly criticize and if anything should be done about them if they are.

 

There're a number definitions of racism that preclude non-whites from the ability to be racist. Some allow for them to be considered prejudiced. Some are expressed as formulas (priviledge+power or prejutice+power) with the key concept being power. I (relatively uninformedly) refer to these as structural definitions.

The question is as the title suggests, and if you're so inclined, please explain what you think should be made of a resolution in either direction. Is it fine if it is? Should be? Should it not? That sort of thing (and why if you've the time).

Would honestly prefer supporters of these definitions to respond though all are welcome; i'd be less likely to engage with your response if it reads like a shitpost in either case.

[–] cockmushroom@reddthat.com 4 points 3 weeks ago (7 children)

Everbody look at bro, he's glowing!

[–] cockmushroom@reddthat.com 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Out of curiosity, what do you suppose is the point of character/world design if a gpu can replace all of your work with entirely different people?

[–] cockmushroom@reddthat.com 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Today i had a segfault that basically froze my entire machine. I was just running some downloads and browsing and all of a sudden i couldn't open, minimize, raise, or close anything.

[–] cockmushroom@reddthat.com -3 points 4 weeks ago

loool! Tbf, it's actually a cool idea given how frequently we have power cuts over here.

-42
submitted 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) by cockmushroom@reddthat.com to c/linuxmemes@lemmy.world
 

Sorry if this belongs elsewhere.

No, I don't think i've ever sworn at it.

[–] cockmushroom@reddthat.com 3 points 4 weeks ago

I never understood the point of letting agents do commits. Like why don't you just fuck off at that point?

 
 
view more: next ›