bignose

joined 9 months ago
 

Edi Zitron has an exclusive report on OpenAI's 2025 finances:

The financial condition of OpenAI is deeply concerning. $38.53 billion in losses are astronomical, and far higher than most believed it would be. Losses also appear to be mounting year-over-year at a dramatic rate, and I’m not sure how this company finds a way toward any kind of sustainability or profitability.

153
submitted 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) by bignose@awful.systems to c/technology@lemmy.world
 

If Google only takes and never gives, then sites cannot profit. What is the incentive to publish if the only outcome is feeding Google’s AI with no return? What sources will LLMs have to pull from if all the sources are defunct? How far will Google go folding adverts into their AI output?

I can see the huge short-term gain for Google, but I see no long-term path – not even an unsustainable one. This feels like the end, but of exactly what I’m uncertain.

[–] bignose@awful.systems 8 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

From TFA:

So what do we search with instead of Google? There isn’t a lot of choice. There’s various flavours of Google or Bing.

[…] Kagi resells Google’s actual link results for a monthly subscription. Kagi is really an AI company that sells search as a sideline, and they’ve got a terrible AI slop news service too. But the search has a good reputation for now.

[–] bignose@awful.systems 0 points 4 weeks ago

I went to the landing page, expecting garbage genAI images; it did not disappoint.

 

Data privacy and AI services have not been the greatest of bedfellows. Studies have shown that employees regularly leak company secrets via assistants, and on-device AI services are a focus of vendors amid concerns about exactly what is being sent to the cloud.

The thought of confidential data being sent to an unknown location in the cloud to generate a helpful summary has clearly worried lawmakers, which is why there is a blanket ban. However, the issue has less relevance if the process occurs on the device itself.

[–] bignose@awful.systems 0 points 6 months ago

Good news every time this happens.

Even better, this blog post is a great reference of the many reasons GitHub is shitty, becoming shittier, and everyone should abandon that platform.

[–] bignose@awful.systems 0 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Thank you for your continuing work to maintain this instance. May the hostile bots turn on their greedy masters so we can all laugh.

[–] bignose@awful.systems 5 points 7 months ago

GEMA versus OpenAI. Whoever wins, we all lose.

But I'm still happy to see them fight.

[–] bignose@awful.systems 2 points 8 months ago

So many of the criticisms here survive essentially unchanged, fifty years later:

If he calls the main loop of his program "UNDERSTAND", he is (until proven innocent) merely begging the question. He may mislead a lot of people, most prominently himself, and enrage a lot of others.[…] If Quillian <1969> had called his program the "Teachable Language Node Net Intersection Finder", he would have saved us some reading. (Except for those of us fanatic about finding the part on teachability.)