Xraygoggles

joined 2 years ago
[–] Xraygoggles@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago

Oh well, I guess I'm still chasing that high of following a sample through to Lone Wolf and Cub.

I just want to watch "The plan is programmed into every one of my thousand robots!"

[–] Xraygoggles@lemmy.world 7 points 4 days ago (3 children)

I've always wondered where some of the samples on this album came from. Great tracks and energy the whole way through.

"And here at the Corporate Institutional Bank of Time, we find ourselves reflecting, finding out that in fact, we came back. We were always coming back..."

[–] Xraygoggles@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Please share the name of the 2D game from 2012, always looking for good recommendations

[–] Xraygoggles@lemmy.world 0 points 4 weeks ago

That il2cpp stuff gives me a big headache though. I guess you could consider that a kind of obfuscation.

[–] Xraygoggles@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Hey just a shot in the dark here, but was it a puzzle book? My favorite puzzle book guy is from Slovenia.

[–] Xraygoggles@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

Not even about the single player for me at all. I probably put a thousand hours into the multiplayer. It just kept giving you more the more you were willing to put into it. It was insanely deep and the mind games were unreal. Even better that it was still the days before SBMM, so you could really see the skill gap. You'd demolish newer people and then get absolutely dumpstered two games later, learn things you didn't know were possible.

And I can't stress enough that there was voice, so not only did a spy grabbing you make a bong that scared you enough to poop your pants if you were laser focused. They could say stuff to you, or worse whisper it to you and then break your neck.

[–] Xraygoggles@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago

Strange loops

[–] Xraygoggles@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago

Wow that's so interesting. I'm excited to try it, thanks for showing me some cool new ideas.

[–] Xraygoggles@lemmy.world 8 points 5 months ago (2 children)
[–] Xraygoggles@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

How did a guy like that ever end up married to a lady named Moon Child?

[–] Xraygoggles@lemmy.world 10 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

I'm not quite sure about this one. I think that the current design on the reverse is an issue. But the front doesn't seem to break any laws.

I'm assuming they print these under subsection Y of 31 U.S. Code § 5112 - Denominations, specifications, and design of coins. Which pertains to these 250th anniversary coins.

The part I see mentioned in this thread frequently applies to a separate subsection (n) for a run of $1 presidential coins that has since ended.

If you just read subsection Y in a vacuum, they are good to go. This part at the bottom though says that the reverse can't be a 'portrait'.

So this isn't really slam dunk illegal, but I don't think that the draft of the coins reverse will make it to print. I would fully expect the front to come out just like that though based on my interpretation.

(aa)Standards and General Provisions for Circulating Collectible Coins Under Subsections (x), (y), and (z).—

(1)Prohibition on certain representations.—

No head and shoulders portrait or bust of any person, living or dead, and no portrait of a living person may be included in the design on the reverse of any coin under subsections (x), (y), and (z).

[–] Xraygoggles@lemmy.world 13 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Oh, this one's easy the way I understand things work now.

He is both former AND current, so fire up the mint.

view more: next ›