WizardGed

joined 2 years ago
[–] WizardGed@lemmy.ca 0 points 23 hours ago

for whatever it's worth I think you're doing a hell of a job 👍

[–] WizardGed@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 day ago

You certainly didn't waste any time with the fallacy.

What about the literal wars killing innocent children, the weaponised rapes, and other war crimes being committed by Israel?

I do not support them and condemn them. I also realize that randomly calling people zionists when the above is the case is indirectly saying they agree with killing innocent children, weaponised rapes, and other war crimes. The reality is whether you like it or not people do call themselves zionists because they believe in the dictionary definition and not the historical and real life consequences that come up when the land that zionism either requires everyone on that land to be okay with it being turned into jewish land when other cultures had claim to it or force. Is it stupid? yep. Do You go around calling for death because they are stupid and don't understand that or think there is some magic man that will make everyone ok with it? No.

I think it should be clear from my language how I "feel" about it.

[–] WizardGed@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 day ago (2 children)

The othering of people and culture wars that some people are doing in that yptb thread is sickening. Also a pretty shit thing to do to go around calling for any group of people to be murdered while at the same time deciding for them if they believe in something/are a part of that group, or not. It's pretty damn sad that intelligent and respectful discussion is pretty much dead on this because if you aren't calling for zionists to killed you must be supporting them. Pacifists and those that want them to face a trial for what has happened be damned. I can already hear the dumb arguments, false dichotomies and fallacies justifying there viewpoints.

[–] WizardGed@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

failed suicide attempts are rarely clean or lead to deep reflection if they have already gone through the maid process. maid is not some kind of instant approval we do it in an hour situation. failed suicide attempts at this level are messy and tend to involve mutilation and even deeper suffering. You seem to assume i am ableist and completely ignore the fact that there are people who have and will suffer to the very end and want assistance in doing something that is inherently undignified with some dignity while not having to worry about a doctor or a family member being charged with manslaughter for being with them in their last moments. maid gives those people a pathway to self reflect before they make a rash decision. please familiarize yourself with maid and the process before misrepresenting how it works.

[–] WizardGed@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (8 children)

then lets not circle back around to who is involved and look at the results of not allowing it. the alternative is failed suicide attempts and long term suffering. assuming we can treat or make people jump through hoops or find some kind of grand arbiter just prolongs suffering and helps us look the other way as we force people poorly trained or in immense pain to figure it out themselves or put themselves/others in legal jeopardy in addition to suffering. If I have the right to life as long as it is not at the expense of others than i have the right to end it.

[–] WizardGed@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 months ago (10 children)

except it doesn't just because maid has been authorized it automatically happens. that decision is as it has always been placed with the one asking for it.

[–] WizardGed@lemmy.ca 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Is there a specific reason you dislike them? I kinda appreciate their simplicity and straightforwardness.

[–] WizardGed@lemmy.ca 0 points 3 months ago

Go for it. if you're running a lemmy instance and cant manage simple comms between other instance admins you really can't complain if they defederate from you. It doesn't seem very busy either with most of the posts being mirrors of other instances.

[–] WizardGed@lemmy.ca 5 points 3 months ago

Great to see the real numbers, thank you. I agree with the sentiment about manufacturing. If it were me, I would tie expanded levels to local manufacturing, with more favorable rates for non-luxury vehicles.

[–] WizardGed@lemmy.ca 25 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I’m in one of the big cities affected by this in Ontario. I’ve got mixed feelings, but I think this may end up being for the better. With all the American manufacturers backsliding on their EV transitions and keeping their prices sky-high for whatever they do have—all while refusing to stand up to Trump in any meaningful way—now, they’ll have to compete or risk losing the market entirely. I still think we should do more and accept vehicle standards from other countries in our market, not just the American ones. This should lower vehicle costs and, in turn, insurance rates for affordable vehicles. It should also make it more economical to export products directly to China, rather than the current convoluted process of selling to intermediary countries that add minimal processing before re-exporting to China at a higher cost.

 

From Jan. 9, 2026, 11:15 PM UTC By Alexandra Marquez, Sarah Dean and Dareh Gregorian

President Donald Trump on Friday ramped up his rhetoric on Greenland, saying the U.S. will take action to acquire the longtime ally. “We are going to do something on Greenland, whether they like it or not, because if we don’t do it, Russia or China will take over Greenland, and we’re not going to have Russia or China as a neighbor,” Trump told reporters at the White House. The remarks come days after White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said in a statement that Trump could use the military to “pursue this important foreign policy goal.” That came on the heels of major European allies issuing in a joint statement saying they would “not stop defending” the values of sovereignty and Greenland’s territorial integrity. President Donald Trump during a meeting at the White House on January 9, 2026. Saul Loeb / AFP - Getty Images Greenland is a semi-autonomous Danish territory that’s strategically important militarily and contains vast mineral wealth. The U.S. already has a military base on the island, and officials there have said they’d accept an expanded military presence. Asked by a reporter Friday why he hasn’t accepted that offer, Trump said, “When we own it, we defend it. You don’t defend leases the same way. You have to own it.” “We’re not going to allow Russia or China to occupy Greenland, and that’s what’s going to happen if we don’t own it,” he said during the public portion of a meeting with oil and gas executives at the White House. As for what he’d be willing to pay for the territory, Trump said, “I’m not talking about money for Greenland yet. I might talk about that, but we’re going to do something on Greenland, whether they like it or not.” The continued pressure from the president comes a day after the top representatives to the U.S. from Denmark and Greenland met with White House officials to seek a better understanding of U.S. policy, a source familiar with the discussions told NBC News. Secretary of State Marco Rubio is scheduled to meet with the foreign ministers of Denmark and Greenland next week. Greenland’s representative to the U.S., Jacob Isbosethsen, also met with lawmakers on Capitol Hill on Thursday and told NBC News afterward that “Greenland is not for sale.” Republican leaders on Capitol Hill have said it would be inappropriate for the U.S. military to use force to take over the Arctic island.

[–] WizardGed@lemmy.ca 0 points 5 months ago

The answers already mentioned are great but I want to add a bit as well. Remember that just like you or I grew up in the countries or culture/group(s) we grew up in and have some allegiance, hold dignity in or have warm feelings for, so do Russia/USSR/KGB about their countries or culture/group. Unfortunately It doesn't seem to really matter for most people if you are in the "wrong" or not. Human nature, society and our baser instincts tell us that betraying, speaking ill, or leaving these places or things are not only bad, but a hugely taboo thing that is one of the most shameful things possible. it runs counter to the baser instincts that have allowed humans to survive as a species. Whats more in a more practical way the majority of the Russian population that the most powerful people are scared of are not really seeing the full damage wholesale. So it's easier to dismiss concerns and issues as exceptions or "one offs" even when life is hard it's easy to compartmentalize it. especially if your culture has an attitude of "Shut up, it could be worse!". unfortunately Russia seems to be shaping up their population to get rid of the people that pose no risk, trying to solve the problem until they win or they cause their society to shatter. the unfortunate thing is that Russia doesn't even fully understand all they have lost yet (no one ever truly does until it's over and they can look back), but they may have already sealed their own fate. There is no amount of children or resources to loot from Ukraine that will undo the damage done by the current war even in the best case scenario. Russian leadership has pretty much dug their own grave as they sacrifice more and more to build their own gallows(the wartime economy that crushes nations and weapons they have neither the people, or allies to sell to).

view more: next ›