WittyProfileName2

joined 5 years ago
[–] WittyProfileName2@hexbear.net 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

What was that album title? 'If you accept this,your kids are next., '

"If You Tolerate This Your Children Will Be Next." By the Manic Street Preachers.

  • Hannah Spencer (Green Party): 14,980 votes
  • Matt Goodwin (Reform UK): 10,578 votes
  • Angeliki Stogia (Labour Party): 9,364 vote

Some blairite think tank is probably right now pitching some previously unheard of form of fascism to Kier Starmer in an attempt to claw some of those Reform voters over next time.

[–] WittyProfileName2@hexbear.net 0 points 2 months ago

Equally Cursed and Blessed by Catatonia.

[–] WittyProfileName2@hexbear.net 0 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Headband of miner intellect:

  • Forged by a dwarven artificer who lost too many colleagues due to their lax attitude around safety.

  • Anyone wearing this headband becomes aware of the quality of air and props for whatever tunnel they're currently in.

  • Wearers possess an intrusive urge to find proper protective equipment before attempting a task.

[–] WittyProfileName2@hexbear.net 0 points 6 months ago

Also it's blunt as a butter knife because none of its past users wanted to try to sharpen something that is always on fire.

[–] WittyProfileName2@hexbear.net 0 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

Immovable Rod:

  • Not actually a magical rod.

  • Actually just a bloke called Roderick, or Rodney, or something to that effect.

  • Won't move out of your way.

  • Not even if you ask politely.

 

I dug too deep this time, delved deep and greedy in my unending quest for truth. I hear the helicopters overhead and the black suited men hammer at my door as I type this, pistol in hand, You must know. I need to tell you all the truth, even if they kill me...

So in 1969 NASA landed a capsule on the moon and did the whole "One small step for man" thingy, except seven years later a bloke named Bill Kaysing claimed NASA faked it, and then in 1980 The Flat Earth Society started the claim that Stanley Kubrick did it. Since then it has quickly bloomed into a much more prevalent belief.

It's convincing theory right? They did it in a desperate attempt to get ahead of the Soviets, NASA realised they could only win the space race if they faked it.

What if I told you that you're being lied to?

The man I mentioned earlier, the one who started it all, Bill Kaysing, was a navy officer with no background in rocket science who alleges to have an inside scoop. He claims to've worked at Rocketdyne when they were manufacturing parts for the Apollo mission, and that the projections gave a 0.0017% chance of them making it to the moon. But people took it with a grain of salt 'cos they only have his word for it.

So just going off this navy guy's hearsay wasn't enough for the longest time. And then NASA stopped landing on the moon, and suddenly the scepticism of the moon landing flares up like petrol tossed on a roaring bonfire.

So what happened?

The US government started circulating these conspiracies is what happened!

The stalling of progress for manned missions presented NASA with a difficult situation where they were making new discoveries but none of the flashy ones that'd get 'em the big grant money/public support.

The machiavellian scheme the CIA concocted was a simple one - if you can make the public believe you didn't land on the moon before, landing on the moon again looks way more impressive.

Big government is lying to you with their moon landing hoax hoax!

Do not let them control the narrative!

I can hear screams, crashing, gunfire echoing in my back garden, it appears one of the government cronies sneaking in out back has fallen down the pitfalls I've dug. It's only so long until they break through the front door.

Good luck my friends, and may the truth prevail.

[–] WittyProfileName2@hexbear.net 11 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

Everything being made in China is a bit of a hyperbole but...

stream of consciousness rant ahead

The rise of neoliberalism involved the deindustrialisation of the imperial core, partly as a way to cheapen costs by relying on a pool of labour with lower minimum wages and worse safety regulations, partly to kneecap labour unions that were forming an effective political bloc against neoliberal social policies, partly to obfuscate the environmental impact of consumerism by shunting all the environmentally hazardous part of the process of producing consumer goods abroad, and partly to complete the transition of imperial core economies entirely into extraction and finance.

At the time China which was liberalising under Dengist reforms and also cosying up to the west, was a perfect target as one of the places to offload industry.

As for why none of this industrial capacity is being moved out of China despite deteriorating relations between them a the imperial core...

Industrialising a country takes a lot of planning and is expensive, (especially in countries like the UK where most of the factories and former supply line infrastructure has been torn up and the land sold off, and what remains is too dilapidated to support a renewed heavy industry), so it's unappealing to a capitalist hegemon that's in favour of austerity and low government spending.

[–] WittyProfileName2@hexbear.net 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

What's the source of that last image? I'm really hoping that's one of the examples from the 80s and not a recent one...

Yeah, that's an 80's one. Here it is in the Tory Party's online archive.

I'm hoping this is just me dooming but having grown up in the dying days of section 28, I'm genuinely scared for this next generation of queer people.

[–] WittyProfileName2@hexbear.net 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (3 children)

Section 28 of the 1988 local government act (often just referred to colloquially as section 28), was a law that made it illegal to discuss queer identities in schools.

here's the relevant excerpt of the act2A

Prohibition on promoting homosexuality by teaching or by publishing material

(1)A local authority shall not—

(a)intentionally promote homosexuality or publish material with the intention of promoting homosexuality;

(b)promote the teaching in any maintained school of the acceptability of homosexuality as a pretended family relationship.

(2)Nothing in subsection (1) above shall be taken to prohibit the doing of anything for the purpose of treating or preventing the spread of disease.

(3)In any proceedings in connection with the application of this section a court shall draw such inferences as to the intention of the local authority as may reasonably be drawn from the evidence before it.

(4)In subsection (1)(b) above “maintained school” means,—

(a)in England and Wales, a county school, voluntary school, nursery school or special school, within the meaning of the Education Act 1944; and

(b)in Scotland, a public school, nursery school or special school, within the meaning of the Education (Scotland) Act 1980.”

It was repealed in 2003, but the recent resurgence of homophobia in parliament is using a similar language around "protecting children" is identical to the shit Thatcher and her cronies were throwing around in the 80's.

for example (CW: homophobia)

[–] WittyProfileName2@hexbear.net 3 points 8 months ago (5 children)

Yeah, and they've jumped the "protect our kids" wankery into overdrive as well.

Complete doomer mode: I think they're also gonna re-establish section 28 soon.

[–] WittyProfileName2@hexbear.net 10 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (7 children)

It's been this kind of shit hole surveillance state for a long time. Look at the snooper's charter/investigatory powers act, for example.

[–] WittyProfileName2@hexbear.net 0 points 8 months ago

Fuck yeah! My "Bigfoot is actually a big cellar spider and that's why it's always blurry in pictures" theory is gonna be broadcast to everyone's grandmother!

 

One bleak and rainy morning I was testing my time travel hypothesis. I'd been attempting to cryogenically freeze myself in the frozen chips section of my local Lidl. Unfortunately the science hating Philistines that worked there kept pulling me out. Ultimately they settled to toss me from the shop entirely.

While I was sitting on carpark tarmac, a strange man approached me. His pale skin told me he got his vitamin D from a bottle and his eyes were heavy with the weight of countless sleepless nights, a fellow delver into the mysteries of this world. Wordlessly, he handed me an envelope before fleeing with an alarming turn of speed.

Inside the envelope was the thumbnail image of this post and two words, "solve this". Challenge accepted!

So what we're looking at is apparently called a Fresno Nightcrawler, and to me it looks like someone's trousers have gone walkabout on their own.

Clearly this can't be the case, trousers lack any kind of muscle to do this. Some outside force must be conveying them. Something the camera can't see.

So I packed all my jeans, and took a hot air balloon over to the sight of the alleged sighting - Fresno, California, USA.

It was there that I set into motion my scheme to capture footage of the creature. Not with the camera, but with pen and paper. I'm no artist myself, so I sought the talents of a particularly gifted one to sketch what he saw as he hid in a bush.

And so the night came. My trousers were hung up. Dave the artist crouched in the undergrowth. I left to get snacks and when I returned both Dave and my trousers were gone, but his notepad remained and what it depicted shocked me.

It was vampires all along.

Not just that, but they'd stolen my favourite shorts. Also probably killed Dave.

I am writing this now as I prepare to locate their lair and end their cruel theft once and for all.

My friends, be careful what you spy within the dead of night, it may also spy you.

 

Any thoughts?

 

There was, like, a stall with this person handing them out.

view more: next ›