UndercoverUlrikHD

« The problem with grabbing small snippets of code is a lot of context is lost.» does not mean that a lot of additional code is required to understand the context, additionally, simple code may require you to read a bit of code to understand it.

Simplicity does not mean small scale, nor that it must be understood at a glance.

Rich Hickey got a great presentation where he discuss simplicity vs complexity. It's worth a watch if you want to better understand the concepts.

https://www.infoq.com/presentations/Simple-Made-Easy/

Simple != few lines of code, nothing incompatible about those two statements

You should probably watch the video before criticising the tech

Disabling JS via ublock works for this specific site

I got a bot on lemmy that scrapes espn for sports/football updates using regex to retrieve the JSON that is embedded in the html file, it works perfectly so far 🤷‍♂️

Dosage depends on the size of the person, there is no flat number. For people who lift with the intention of gaining muscle size, there's is a positive trend of additional hypertrophy that starts to flatten out at around 1,6g/kg.

From the second sentence on the page:

It is different from loss leader marketing and product sample marketing, which do not depend on complementary products or services.

So the Razor and blades model would probably be the more accurate term for what people thought the new steam hardwate would be, yeah.

Though steam won't lock you to their services.

A product sold at a loss/very attractive price to attract customers. The idea is that they customers will come due to the cheap price of a desirable product and buy additional other stuff at the store, which should hopefully make up for the loss.

E.g. a restaurant advertise cheap burgers to attract customers, and then make the profit on alcoholic beverages that customers buy alongside the cheap burger.

Though to be fair, I think the study would yield similar results to pretty much every country.

They do, it's just lemmy hiding the mod usernames for normal users. Admins can see the moderator names in the mod log.

https://programming.dev/post/38467491

Assume you're saving X amount of money each month for your retirement.

Your options for storing that money is either:

1. In cash which will "lessen" in value as time goes by due to inflation
2. In a savings account with middling interest rate
3. Or you could invest in the stock market which will typically offer better return.

Assuming you go for option 3, would you choose to invest in a company with zero growth meaning your retirement fund won't grow, or would you choose a company that is constantly growing?

Nobody would choose to invest in a company with zero growth or which doesn't return money back in the form of dividends.

You're objectively better off investing in companies that grow since those are the companies that will grow your investment.