MLs
Weren't posts from RT and TASS downvoted even on ML?
MLs
Weren't posts from RT and TASS downvoted even on ML?
Yeah, but their content does.
Because itβs essentially what youβre saying in subtext.
No, I didnβt imply any of this.
I'm not sure what you mean. I don't like any of the media we mentioned in this dialogue. Not because of where they get their funding, but because of their content. I explained why I don't like TASS in this comment section above.
I don't think they're doing this because they are concerned about citizens' safety or privacy. I think the main goal is to replace these platforms with their own proprietary alternatives. This way, the ruling class can earn more money and gain full control over the content people consume. If safety were truly a concern, why not fund PeerTube development? Or open-source what they've developed?
Anyway, I prefer to decide which websites to access on my own. I think allowing an oligarchy to make that decision for us can't be a good thing.
I think they're banned for similar reasons to why Fox News articles are banned. I agree with your comment above - the source doesn't necessarily make something false. It would be silly for any outlet to post only misinformation. But some sources are worse than others. I wouldn't read any news about Ukraine from either Ukrainian or Russian state-owned sources. They're one sided to the extreme.
Regarding alt right - that might be a stretch, yeah. They're conservative (for example, they're anti-LGBT because it's banned by the law) and telling how're liberating Ukrainian people. But I don't think it's qualified as alt-right.
I'm not a westerner. But TASS and RT are like Fox News in the US. Those are simply bad sources.
Ah, it could be, yes. But I quickly checked a few popular instances and looks like OP was banned on many. For example: dbzero (profile), lemmy.world (profile), piefed.social (profile, no such user), lemmy.zip (profile).
So these post wasn't visible to many, yet still downvoted (I assume mostly by local users). Some may argue that all sources are biased - I agree. However, the articles OP posted wasn't good. For example, you can check my other comment under a similar post from the OP: https://lemmy.ml/post/44675222/24621308.