SalmiakDragon

No, this is a new image - you'd notice if you compared them. Also, do you actually believe the slop Trump posted is effective propaganda to anyone but his cult following?

I can see being against this post because AI. Your point, not so much.

It's ridiculous, it literally looks like an AI was asked to Chad-ify Trump.

Edit: Spelling

I was trying to be polite, and leave room in case I had misunderstood. A simple clarification of what you meant would have sufficed.

This is real?

attach women

Did you mean 'attack'?

They're involuntarily gritting out their words every time the noice happens.

For short clips, I think that this kind of "this guy said this" content is very achievable for AI - example (tbf this one is still 'person-based' as it's motion ~~capture~~ controlled)

Thanks for attempting to explain it.

You seem to have gotten Gemini and Claude mixed up? Your previous comment only mentioned Gemini.

Bolding mine:

If the article mentioned a “bullet that killed Charlie Kirk,” it is likely referring to a viral piece of misinformation or a specific satirical news story. Charlie Kirk is alive; therefore, any article claiming he was killed by a bullet is either: Satire: (e.g., The Onion or The Babylon Bee style content). Misinformation: A hoax designed to trigger a reaction.

Um, does Gemini not know that Charlie Kirk is dead?? (Yes I know AI doesn't really "know" things)

The neck folds look identical to me.

This reminds me of the Saw puppet.

I saw the movie, it was very enjoyable.