Miller

This is clearly nonsense, some people don't shower every day.

Remember when people used to go insane in newsgroups screaming bloat if a program update was 80 KB bigger than the previous version and now people do not notice an extra 4 GB.

At least they are doing it by the numbers, the Ministry of Peace is up and running to maintain a perpetual war, this latest move helps establish the Ministry of Love managing surveillance and fear. The Ministry of Truth was already in place for propaganda and the rewriting of news and history. There will be no love except the love of Big T.

Also a lot of politicians can lick their own eyes.

Same capitalist market where billionaires receive massive socialistic handouts, bailouts and tax negations from governments.

I am not watching that video because it presents exactly as bait. The title suggests the video will reveal an extraordinary truth, the text summary that is coupled with it should give the reader a concise render of that truth so as to be able to decide if they want to view the longer version laid out in the video but it actually just rephrases the title over and over, watch the video for an undisclosed amazing truth. The object is clearly not to impart information but to get clicks and it is a safe bet the majority of the video therefore will follow that same style with the motivation not to inform but to force the user to stay to the end.

I meant no suggestion of a negative aspect towards floozihood, I have drunk cider with many such in my life I only noted my comprehension of their intention of attention.

If he is 78 and using AI to generate responses he is not declining in any significant way, the thing you may need to accept is not his decline but his withdrawal from you.

Well it is more difficult to cancel them after.

I think any satisfaction derived from either is simply from a feeling of good maintenance and is unremarkable and the fact you have indeed remarked upon it suggests you only wish to draw attention to your anatomy like a floozy.

The more general thing is that all love relationships are unrequited to a degree. The unrequitedness is on a sliding scale from examples conventionally described as unrequited to anything where there is an asymmetry in the love which is most cases. Usually one partner will love the other more and I think this is by evolved design, it means that in significant disagreements the one that loves more will back down as they fear the loss of the relationship more. Unevenness of the shared love will allow the bond to maintain itself when more equally bonded partnerships would have broken.

It is not very complex, both are generalist reference terms, shit can be a neutral referrer or have negative connotations and dope can be neutral or have positive connotations. So your two phrases decant to this referred to thing is a good thing and this referred to thing is a bad thing.