But in a totally non-gay way because they are very manly men, who are in fact not gay. Some say the most heterosexual a man can be
Laser
joined 2 years ago
I don't think it was that channel linking them.
If you're an oil company: yes. If not: no.
What you're implying makes no sense.
The ships passing are not "NATO owned". They're most likely not even ships owned by the armed forces of NATO countries apart from the US. And even if they were attacked, this is outside of the territory of the NATO member state, which is a condition for triggering article 5.
Right?
Are these right wing politicians living in their own bubble or am I? Why would anyone want to be associated with the US administration in general and Vance in particular at this time? Who looks at this and thinks "oh, the venerable vice president of the United States endorses this guy, surely I'll give him my vote"?
There have been about 0 good news from the US in the last year. If I were a politician I'd distance myself from that trainwreck so hard
Well, technically, it's not broken, just slower
Well, it doesn't silently ignore files, it tells you if the work tree is dirty.
Though I've tripped over the different behaviors of the repl vs the rest of the tools myself in funny ways
That however was before "stone ages" threat
Firefox always has tabs, in fact even the Mozilla Application Suite had them since 2001. Gmail came out 3 years later. Though I would have thought that there were about 5 years between these events
That swiping keyboard typo happens way more often to me than it doesn't
I totally know how NATO works (am former soldier from a NATO country), I know Mario is a defensive treaty and even if you're a member it doesn't mean other member nations have to cooperate with you outside of NATO related activities. So yes no NATO members need to join, and no NATO member has to support the US (even if just by allowing to use the air space) outside of NATO missions it exercises.
view more: next ›
Kind of interesting. One would think these are prime customers for futures contracts and as such, their cost would have been fixed months ago. I can't imagine the big airlines buy on the spot market.
I rather think this is a bit of a pretext to close otherwise economically unviable routes without losing slots.
But who knows, I'm not against airlines closing routes at all.