That says “proposed” - not implemented, though?
And if it's under Trump's administration, I can't take anything like that as any indication of reason or sustainability.
Trump is part of crime.
That says “proposed” - not implemented, though?
And if it's under Trump's administration, I can't take anything like that as any indication of reason or sustainability.
Trump is part of crime.
“can't be traced” - it's a public blockchain, though. Everyone can see and trace transactions.
When the money source is clear - it's the shipping companies - you can trace their transactions.
Is it a war crime to attack the military leader? I kind of doubt that. Military targets are fine under international law.
The usual ambivalence of "why is this even news when a bullshitter bullshits" vs "gotta call out official government bullshit". I guess, in this case, it's more directly actually relevant to EU politics as attacks on the EU.
I wish press were more direct, dismissive, and outright toxic to these notorious liars, bullshitters, and enemies of society.
And I wish I wouldn't have to read this name at all anymore.
I find this article layout a bit confusing. Looks like it was a live-updates page. As a page and article/content, I find it pretty bad, though.
Could the US have vetoed the whole process, and no vote would have taken place? Or what does this differentiation mean?
At the very least, it's not the article that makes the causal connection but the study, at least its press release.
Der Druck auf die junge Generation steigt und die Chancen, diesen gerecht zu werden, schwinden. Dauerkrisen, unsichere berufliche Perspektiven, Schulden und mentaler Stress prägen die Lebenslage vieler junger Menschen. Als Reaktion wenden sie sich den politischen Rändern zu oder denken sogar daran, Deutschland zu verlassen. Das ist die zentrale Botschaft der neunten Trendstudie „Jugend in Deutschland“
We'll either have to trust that or not. But there's no real indication that the causality is not there. To verify the claim we'd need access to the study.
Thank you for linking the study document.
I don't think the article is any more negative than the study summary you label neutral in terms of causes. Both list various issues, in a similar way.
What kind of measures do current Denuvo versions take that they need these kinds of bypasses?
Laughing is very healthy. You're doing great!
The article is very negative, so I assume the study results are too.
It would be nice if we could see it as the European idea of free movement and exchange between countries. With most Germans emigrating to Switzerland, Austria, and Spain - that is the European idea of a union, free movement, and free personal exploration. People leaving Germany is a national view. They are European citizens.
Borders are open. Switzerland did not join the EU (by a 0.1% vote margin in 1997 IIRC), but through three consecutive agreements is very closely aligned with and integrated to the EU, including free movement and work (IIRC).
Are you aware that you're responding in German but with an English content label?