Well I just called dibs, so... And Lemmy comments are legally binding, of course.
Marry me, PhoenixDog, so I can into Canada
People will "but actually" even the most cut and dry observations, and it's sad.
You're doing the same thing.
God forbid someone share an anecdote?
Ugh, lucky. My friend is even getting Canadian citizenship now thanks to a recent law change there and his grandmother being a Canadian citizen.
It's just a joke, y'all are really over thinking it. I'm fully aware that watching the movies and reading the books are different experiences. The joke was that a summary cuts things just like the movie. That's it.
Yeah, my parents told me once that when my grandparents pass away there was a nice chunk of money that would be coming. I never planned around it or anything. Some time after they passed I was a little curious about it and asked what happened, that was pretty much what they said, that it probably had all been used up by hospital and nursing home bills. End of life care is the last chance to suck up that dough, I guess.
Yeah, a lot like a summary?
I'll just watch the movies, thank 💪
Seeing you reply made me click the link, where is my beloved! At least the new owners want to keep it Zombo.
I value WFH pretty highly myself, so honestly I'd consider it passed to me as well if it meant not having to RTO.
I think it's a variety of factors and a lot of decision makers failing to view the picture holistically (optimistic view) or just being malicious (pessimistic).
- A lot of top level decision makes are very aware of the costs of things. Knowing exactly how much money a large office space costs and constantly coming in only to see it very empty makes them want to see it used more.
- Face to face communication is better than the alternative. Full stop. That said, you can get like ~75% of that by just turning the camera on. I think a lot of places should just consider encouraging people to use their cameras more.
- The executive mindset is probably that people goof off less in the office.
- If you want to lay people off, forcing RTO is a good way to get people to leave voluntarily.
- There's likely a sense of "the way things have always been done" being inherently better in the minds of some executives pushing RTO.
I think ultimately it's short sighted. I think companies that actually are facing problems with WFH (and not just being malicious) should try to address them in different ways instead of just killing it off.
This should solve my power for a while. Turbofuel is really nice. Clean burning, too!
Pro tip: Power shards increase power consumption exponentially for machines, but linearly for generators. That means that a generator at 250% overclock is exactly the same as 2.5 generators at 100%. This saves a lot of space with turbofuel. In the bottom right you'll see 25 generators. Without overclocking I would've needed 63 of them. I have been judicious with my power shards, so this was nice.
I was really satisfied with this picture. You can see pretty much all of the build in one shot The only thing you can't see is the sulfur extraction.
Oops.
1
[SOLVED] Bug in 1.5 during bestow ceremony, my royal doesn't go, any ideas? (Logs attached!)
(gist.github.com)
YES, I did solve this post as I was writing it. YES, I am still going to post it. THE PROBLEM WAS THAT THERE WAS A CHESS TABLE IN FRONT OF MY THRONE. This does not prevent people from using the throne, but during the bestow ceremony they need that spot apparently.
Relevant snippet of logs below. The link has the entirety that got uploaded.
First, I am playing with mods, but even after I disable literally all mods and start this quest fresh to do the bestow ceremony it still does this, so I don't think it's the mods. Also as the title says this is 1.5. If I was playing on 1.6 I would upload these to a more official source.
When I tell my royal to begin the bestow ceremony, he just idles. Nobody else reacts to join, they just keep doing whatever. He just sits there, frozen in time. I let the game run for ~12 hours (in-game) and he still hadn't moved.
Searching around this seems to be somewhat of a known bug, but I'm not seeing anything about these logs specifically. I have tried calling the bestower in multiple times and each time he freezes. Even when I do the "cancel ceremony" and call them back later it does the same thing. Even when I remove all the optional spectators it does this.
In the bottom right you can see Grump idling. In the bottom left you can see that he is trying to attend the bestow ceremony. In the top left you can see the bestower waiting.
Failed to find a spectator spot for Rofro
(Filename: ./Runtime/Export/Debug/Debug.bindings.h Line: 39)
Failed to find a spectator spot for Unay
(Filename: ./Runtime/Export/Debug/Debug.bindings.h Line: 39)
Failed to find a spectator spot for Grill
(Filename: ./Runtime/Export/Debug/Debug.bindings.h Line: 39)
Failed to find a spectator spot for Prosecco
(Filename: ./Runtime/Export/Debug/Debug.bindings.h Line: 39)
Failed to find a spectator spot for Herc
(Filename: ./Runtime/Export/Debug/Debug.bindings.h Line: 39)
Failed to find a spectator spot for Dani
(Filename: ./Runtime/Export/Debug/Debug.bindings.h Line: 39)
Failed to find a spectator spot for Marty
(Filename: ./Runtime/Export/Debug/Debug.bindings.h Line: 39)
Failed to find a spectator spot for Lion
(Filename: ./Runtime/Export/Debug/Debug.bindings.h Line: 39)
Failed to find a spectator spot for Rofro
(Filename: ./Runtime/Export/Debug/Debug.bindings.h Line: 39)
TryMakePreToilReservations() returned false for a non-queued job right after StartJob(). This should have been checked before. pawn = Grump, curJob = BestowingCeremony (Job_5837199) A = Thing_Human922515 Giver = JobGiver_BestowingCeremony [workGiverDef: null]
(Filename: ./Runtime/Export/Debug/Debug.bindings.h Line: 39)
Failed to find a spectator spot for Isarita
(Filename: ./Runtime/Export/Debug/Debug.bindings.h Line: 39)
Failed to find a spectator spot for Lynx
(Filename: ./Runtime/Export/Debug/Debug.bindings.h Line: 39)
Failed to find a spectator spot for Gillespie
(Filename: ./Runtime/Export/Debug/Debug.bindings.h Line: 39)
Failed to find a spectator spot for Prosecco
(Filename: ./Runtime/Export/Debug/Debug.bindings.h Line: 39)
TryMakePreToilReservations() returned false for a non-queued job right after StartJob(). This should have been checked before. pawn = Grump, curJob = BestowingCeremony (Job_5837443) A = Thing_Human922515 Giver = JobGiver_BestowingCeremony [workGiverDef: null]
(Filename: ./Runtime/Export/Debug/Debug.bindings.h Line: 39)
Failed to find a spectator spot for Rofro
(Filename: ./Runtime/Export/Debug/Debug.bindings.h Line: 39)
TryMakePreToilReservations() returned false for a non-queued job right after StartJob(). This should have been checked before. pawn = Grump, curJob = BestowingCeremony (Job_5837531) A = Thing_Human922515 Giver = JobGiver_BestowingCeremony [workGiverDef: null]
(Filename: ./Runtime/Export/Debug/Debug.bindings.h Line: 39)
Failed to find a spectator spot for Wingman
(Filename: ./Runtime/Export/Debug/Debug.bindings.h Line: 39)
Failed to find a spectator spot for Rofro
(Filename: ./Runtime/Export/Debug/Debug.bindings.h Line: 39)
TryMakePreToilReservations() returned false for a non-queued job right after StartJob(). This should have been checked before. pawn = Grump, curJob = BestowingCeremony (Job_5837775) A = Thing_Human922515 Giver = JobGiver_BestowingCeremony [workGiverDef: null]
(Filename: ./Runtime/Export/Debug/Debug.bindings.h Line: 39)
TryMakePreToilReservations() returned false for a non-queued job right after StartJob(). This should have been checked before. pawn = Grump, curJob = BestowingCeremony (Job_5838023) A = Thing_Human922515 Giver = JobGiver_BestowingCeremony [workGiverDef: null]
(Filename: ./Runtime/Export/Debug/Debug.bindings.h Line: 39)
TryMakePreToilReservations() returned false for a non-queued job right after StartJob(). This should have been checked before. pawn = Grump, curJob = BestowingCeremony (Job_5838272) A = Thing_Human922515 Giver = JobGiver_BestowingCeremony [workGiverDef: null]
(Filename: ./Runtime/Export/Debug/Debug.bindings.h Line: 39)
More in depth log message about the TryMakePreToilReservations().
TryMakePreToilReservations() returned false for a non-queued job right after StartJob(). This should have been checked before. pawn = Grump, curJob = BestowingCeremony (Job_5837036) A = Thing_Human922515 Giver = JobGiver_BestowingCeremony [workGiverDef: null]
UnityEngine.StackTraceUtility:ExtractStackTrace ()
Verse.Log:Warning (string)
(wrapper dynamic-method) MonoMod.Utils.DynamicMethodDefinition:Verse.AI.Pawn_JobTracker.StartJob_Patch1 (Verse.AI.Pawn_JobTracker,Verse.AI.Job,Verse.AI.JobCondition,Verse.AI.ThinkNode,bool,bool,Verse.ThinkTreeDef,System.Nullable`1<Verse.AI.JobTag>,bool,bool,System.Nullable`1<bool>,bool,bool,bool)
Verse.AI.Pawn_JobTracker:CheckForJobOverride_NewTemp (single,bool)
Verse.AI.Pawn_JobTracker:CheckForJobOverride (single)
RimWorld.LordToil_BestowingCeremony_Perform:UpdateAllDuties ()
Verse.AI.Group.Lord:GotoToil (Verse.AI.Group.LordToil)
Verse.AI.Group.Transition:Execute (Verse.AI.Group.Lord)
Verse.AI.Group.Transition:CheckSignal (Verse.AI.Group.Lord,Verse.AI.Group.TriggerSignal)
Verse.AI.Group.Lord:CheckTransitionOnSignal (Verse.AI.Group.TriggerSignal)
Verse.AI.Group.Lord:ReceiveMemo (string)
RimWorld.LordToil_BestowingCeremony_Wait:StartRitual (System.Collections.Generic.List`1<Verse.Pawn>)
RimWorld.LordToil_BestowingCeremony_Wait:<ExtraFloatMenuOptions>b__7_1 (RimWorld.RitualRoleAssignments)
RimWorld.Dialog_BeginRitual:<Start>g__InnerStart|38_0 ()
RimWorld.Dialog_BeginRitual:Start ()
RimWorld.Dialog_BeginLordJob:DoButtonRow (Verse.RectDivider&,bool)
RimWorld.Dialog_BeginLordJob:DoWindowContents (UnityEngine.Rect)
(wrapper dynamic-method) MonoMod.Utils.DynamicMethodDefinition:Verse.Window.InnerWindowOnGUI_Patch0 (Verse.Window,int)
UnityEngine.GUI:CallWindowDelegate (UnityEngine.GUI/WindowFunction,int,int,UnityEngine.GUISkin,int,single,single,UnityEngine.GUIStyle)
view more: next ›
I once heard someone describe legacy systems as systems without test coverage. I think it's not the best description, but it's certainly an interesting perspective.
It's part of why it bothers me when folks say they use LLMs to make unit tests. If anything, you should be writing tests by hands to get a solid specification then let the AI make the code. Of course this is a false dichotomy, but I'm just saying if you have to choose between those two options in some weird hypothetical bizarro world.