HaSch

joined 5 years ago
[–] HaSch@lemmygrad.ml 0 points 7 hours ago

Every recent retiree will tell you that work (not wage labour) is just as essential to "restore our battery levels" as rest and play. High-ranking managers and directors are sometimes given meaningless busywork after retiring because they want to feel important and consequential

[–] HaSch@lemmygrad.ml 0 points 7 hours ago

The "brave warriors" cannot handle a little pinprick

[–] HaSch@lemmygrad.ml 0 points 7 hours ago

Germany in particular is at a breaking point where it cannot really support more people living the big cities without a major national housing initiative. If you don't want to raise your kid in the boondocks of Lower Saxony, tough luck

[–] HaSch@lemmygrad.ml 0 points 1 month ago

So there's this boy fighting evil aliens in a giant robot

[–] HaSch@lemmygrad.ml 0 points 1 month ago

Mamoru Oshii must be feeling so validated rn

[–] HaSch@lemmygrad.ml 0 points 1 month ago

Non-generative models like RNNs or symbolic AI, sure. Generative models warrant a special caveat.

Such models, especially LLMs, are different from other technology in that even when they are being used by proletarians for their own aims, they contain a certain element of danger that is subtle and hidden behind the facade of a simple chatbot. Over time, the user will be misled into thinking that they are talking to another human, which has already led to suicides and murders instigated by them.

This is not because there is anything spooky about the technology itself, it's just linear algebra and probability theory running on a big computer, but because the human mind tends to project its own thoughts and feelings onto other people, animals, and indeed objects. However, unlike with other humans, the user of an LLM will be much less careful, observant, and restrained in their fantasies, especially since it is eager to please and will try to motivate them towards continuing down the line.

If a socialist society is to put generative models to use, it must be able to somehow prevent "discussions" with the model to venture into psychologically suspicious territories. An LLM must never replace human interaction, it must no venture guesses about your friends and family, and especially it must NEVER be used for therapy. Nothing good can come from pretending it cares about you. Only then, and after following many other guardrails already in place for both training and use, can we even claim to enjoy its benefits.

[–] HaSch@lemmygrad.ml 0 points 1 month ago

The atrophy of the American public mirrors the ossification of its administrative state. As the EPA, the CDC, the USPS, and other institutions representing bourgeois concessions to the proletariat are systematically eroded, the American working class has no longer any means to realise its own interests through administrative means, and it loses the ability to meaningfully shape its environment. The space of potential futures within the system is considerably narrowed, and the narrower it becomes, the less people find a future in it worth fighting for by legal means. Expect protests to die down, and instead more assassins and armed groups to emerge.

 

This paper describes a method by which an LLM can be used to hide a text, list, or programming code using a prompt with the right key, by masking it as an output text of the same token size. The same method can also be used for jailbreaks, i.e. circumventing censorship of the answers given by the model

[–] HaSch@lemmygrad.ml 0 points 1 month ago (2 children)

The secret to keeping friends is to actually communicate with them at least every few weeks. It doesn't need to be anything big, just checking in and signalling that you exist and do care. If you don't do this, even if you yourself can remember, they might forget because tragically, this is just the way the human brain works for most people. When Steve moved, he likely went and looked out for other people to help him over the loss of this connection, and then they became his best friends, not immediately, but over the course of years and years. Even though none of this was your fault, how was he supposed to know you were still interested in his life after not hearing from you for over a decade?

[–] HaSch@lemmygrad.ml 0 points 1 month ago

The KPD faced tens of thousands of Nazis in open battle on the street, which might well be called "doing nothing" in comparison to the SPD's strategy of trying to appeal to centre-right voters by assassinating Rosa Luxemburg

[–] HaSch@lemmygrad.ml 0 points 2 months ago

Basically every Ghibli movie that deals with WWII (Grave of the Fireflies, The Wind Rises, Porco Rosso etc). Miyazaki lost his mother in the war and spent his entire career traumatised by the contributions of his father to the imperial war machine as an airplane designer

[–] HaSch@lemmygrad.ml 0 points 2 months ago

Whoever wrote this headline, I can assure you that China's dance robots will never be equipped to handle your kind of gymnastics

[–] HaSch@lemmygrad.ml 0 points 2 months ago

I sure wonder if there is any historical precedent of this specific thing actually happening and how it might have worked out in, say, the winter of 1812

 

Comrades, today I had the pleasure of participating in our city's First of May demonstration, and to purchase two books from the local chapter of the MLPD (Marxist-Leninist Party of Germany). One of them is pretty well-known, it is the Dialectics of Nature by Friedrich Engels; the other was an obscure philosophy tract written by one Mr Oscar Creydt where he attempts to reframe the entire history of the universe from a ML point of view, which is why I went in there with high expectations, namely that it would use recent discoveries from natural science to develop new ML philosophy.

Unfortunately for me however, whilst the book started promising and ambitious and it does demonstrate a good grasp of the historical developments of quantum mechanics, by page 60 of 220 it occurs to the author that he wants to deny Einstein's theory of general relativity, arguably the most well-tested and internally consistent theory in all of physics. But this was only the hors-d'oeuvre of the work, he goes on to try and reduce every single phenomenon in the universe to the vibration inherent to photons (which he calls "radions"), he spouts metaphysical nonsense about why the speed of light is constant, he declares the cosmic microwave background radiation to be the "primitive stage" of this vibration because Big Bang cosmology isn't real either, and he makes no attempt to explain cosmological redshift, gravitational lensing, or the perihelion precession of Mercury with his mental construction.

Now bear in mind that I don't necessarily want to accuse the author of being bad at science. The foreword of the book explicitly remarks that due to the anticommunist Stroessner regime in Paraguay, he couldn't rely on qualified people to empirically test or mathematically proofread his work, it is possible that the libraries he frequented just didn't have reliable books on the topics, and even the best scientists might publish utter drivel after having to work in isolation for decades. However, it is obvious that the mistake with this approach is that you cannot start with your own interpretation of dialectical materialism, and then change science to fit into it. This is a misconception of ML philosophy which many theoretically-minded comrades have already exposed, including on this very website. The refutation to it is that rather than relying on some rigid dogma formulated by humans, nature begets the shape of her own dialectics via her own interactions with herself; which is why we must study nature to arrive at natural philosophy and not vice versa.

The last thing I want to remark is that, if instead it had been let's say a Christian fanfic of science, one would immediately have noticed from the lack of footnotes and historical background knowledge, the presence of biblical and other nonscientific references, the use of odd figures and diagrams derived from gnosticism, or the extensive use of all-capital letter words. Here, there were no such signs. Marxist-Leninist scientific malpractice is especially worrisome because you might not even notice it until several pages into the book and even then the errors are of a much more subtle nature and require background knowledge.

view more: next ›