Feyd

Just fucking stop using it? Wtf? Tell you boss to pound sand! They're going to blame you when it goes south anyway so you might as well stay honest.

You're agreeing with the comment you replied to. Why the fuck are you trying to be so smug???

Just look at who's been winning all the special elections. The fascists either lock this shit in like Russia in the next 3 years or they're fucked

Sabatoging AI strategy = getting things done the way that works instead of the top down directive that doesn't

A tale as old as time

I'm the US at least, animal agriculture is heavily subsidized, so consumers don't see what it actually costs. Supply/demand economics everyone learned in school rarely applies amidst the chicanery rampant everywhere.

I’ve never been able to program in anything more complex than BASIC and command line batch files, but I’m able to get useful output from Claude.

Chatbots being deemed useful in tasks by people unqualified to make those judgments is a running problem.

I was not disparaging homemaking. Now, many people have to scrape together that labor AND do a paid job, which is obviously a degradation in quality of life.

RE: rich country poor country - we have enough labor globally to make everyone happy and healthy globally. That quality of life is so different in different places is another symptom of the global system of economic serfdom.

verify with every output it produces.

I agree that you can get quality output using these tools, but if you actually take the time to validate and fix everything they've output then you spend more time than if you'd just written it, rob yourself of experience, and melt glaciers for no reason in the process.

prompt to restrict it from auto committing, auto pushing, and auto editing without explicit verification

Anything in the prompt is a suggestion, not a restriction. You are correct you should restrict those actions, but it must be done outside of the chatbot layer. This is part of the problem with this stuff. People using it don't understand what it is or how it works at all and are being ridiculously irresponsible.

repetitive sections

Repetitive sections that are logic can be factored down and should be for maintainability. Those that can't be can be written with tons of methods. A list of words can be expanded into whatever repetitive boilerplate with sed, awk, a python script etc and you'll know nothing was hallucinated because it was deterministic in the first place.

user tests.

Tests are just as important as the rest of the code and should be given the same amount of attention instead of being treated as fine as long as you check the box.

There is still a substantial amount of working age people in that scenario. They just need to be allocated to jobs that matter instead of made up bullshit like for instance the vast majority of medical insurance employees. We have enough labor available that we could live in a straight up utopia but instead much of it is oriented to perpetuating economic serfdom.

Think about it... We used to have a large proportion of people running households instead of working for money, but now we both have more automaton than ever and a higher percentage of people in the labor market, and we don't even work fewer hours.

I rather doubt that.... I wouldn't even know it existed if framework hadn't sponsored it.

They're the same people that copied code from stack overflow that you had to tell them how to actually fix every PR. The difference is the C suite types are backing them this time

Society doesn't have to work that way.