Chulk

joined 2 years ago
[–] Chulk@lemmy.ml 74 points 5 days ago (4 children)

The tests also showed how broadly the camera’s plate detector could interpret what it saw. In some cases, it mistook bumper stickers, dealership frames, and other graphics for license plates and cropped them out as if they were plates. In one video of a passing motorcycle, the detector cropped an American flag patch on the rider’s saddlebag as if it were a plate.

This stood out to me. Call me cynical, but I don't think this is a mistake. I think they're calling all of these "misidentified" license plates a "license plate" to simply establish plausible deniability for collecting this data. It would be pretty trivial for their backend system to interpret the images server side and build an identification profile for each vehicle. This way, even if you remove your plate, your vehicle can be identified.

I wonder how quickly they could build a profile on every vehicle in the US simply by having cameras up in every major city? When we defeat flock/axon, what's stopping the next surveillance company from buying that data and using it?

[–] Chulk@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

pike rocketed into mainstream fame out of nowhere

No he didn't lol. He started in the young Turks in like 2013. He's been streaming on twitch since 2018. Yes his popularity has increased quite a bit in recent years, but it was not "out of nowhere"

i'm positing that piker and platner were both elevated because people feel that they're progressive, but they only have centrist platforms.

At this point, he's to the left of Bernie Sanders, who is to the left of most of the Democratic party. For a figure in the United States, he's not a centrist. Especially on the subject of Palestine. If anything he's been elevated as punching bag for centrists.

[–] Chulk@lemmy.ml 33 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Can't wait for copies of my brain to be tortured eternally by Grok

[–] Chulk@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 week ago

Wasn't the Nova Music Festival also moved closer to the border days before?

[–] Chulk@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Lmao the USA was the only country who voted no of course.

[–] Chulk@lemmy.ml 15 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Isn't Omarchy built on top of Arch Linux? I wonder what sort of effect it will have on Arch to have companies injecting millions into this downstream project?

[–] Chulk@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 weeks ago

And since the USA is at war with half the world, the Pentagon will ensure that it never dries up.

[–] Chulk@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 weeks ago

That makes sense given what I'm reading right now. I stumbled across an article that hand-waved this, saying that the only difference between the two operations was that the USA's program was more successful in leveraging the knowledge from Nazi scientists/engineers. But it seems to me that the "success" (weird to call it that) was largely because of what you're saying. The United States gave Nazis real paths to power when they succeeded, and thus allowed prominent Nazis to survive Germany's fall. Like you said, the Soviets basically shipped them to an island at gunpoint and then released them once they were no longer deemed useful.

Anyway, I appreciate the reply.

[–] Chulk@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I've always thought Operation Paperclip was one of the biggest travesties in modern history.

This video states that Soviets did not have a version of this and that they "killed every Nazi." Is that true though? I thought they had their own program (Operation Osoaviakhim) that recruited German scientists after the war.

Genuinely asking because I used to believe that operation Paperclip was one of a kind until I was corrected by someone.

[–] Chulk@lemmy.ml 6 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

I just wish this kind of thing worked both ways. Instead, we have establishment Democrats leaning into rightwing framing and ratfucking the Michigan Senate race and a potential Senate majority over a Twitch Streamer's comments.

Cuomo made racist AI-generated ads about Mamdani and had the full backing of the establishment while he did it. Even after Mamdani won the nomination, Jeffries and Schumer (both New York dems) refused to endorse him for months. They both undermined Mamdani at every turn and peddled the same right-wing innuendo that he is somehow inherently untrustworthy/dangerous to Jews. They almost allowed a sex pest independent to beat a popular democrat in their own state.

But Mamdani better be a good little progressive and support the feckless Zionist in his conquest for a leadership role that he will use to invariably move the party further to the right. Otherwise Mamdani might create for a rift in the party.

Edit: not disagreeing with your take, just voicing frustration

[–] Chulk@lemmy.ml 56 points 3 weeks ago

This is the guy Abdul El-Sayed is running against.

[–] Chulk@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

"I didn't see it so it didn't happen" said every bully enabling schoolteacher ever.

I think we're all still waiting to hear what it is that happened.

view more: next ›