CheeseBread

joined 2 years ago
[–] CheeseBread@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

Polyamory isn't a sexuality. It's a dating preference. Most of these labels do apply to me, and I think they're redundant.

 

Is the border substantial enough? Or should I add more?

 

I made a new year's resolution this year to lose weight. I started at 265 at the beginning of the year. I have been making a lot of changes to my lifestyle, and I've been working really hard and very slowly losing weight. I am at 246 today, and I feel like my progress isn't good enough. I spent 10 months really trying, and for what? Not even twenty pounds? I don't really feel or look a lot different. I put in so much work and I feel really discouraged from continuing. How do you keep going? I feel like I'll never get to a healthy weight.

[–] CheeseBread@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago

Yes it does. Read the bisexual manifesto.

[–] CheeseBread@lemmy.ml 9 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (16 children)

Pansexual, polysexual, and omnisexual are all microlabels and are all subsets of bisexual. You don't need more labels than gay, straight, and bi.

Edit: I forgot about asexuals. But I specifically only care about bi subsets. They're dumb, and you only need bi