Thanks for pointing that out. A lot of people some seem to realize automation was doing fine before LLMs.
The dark factories don't need LLMs.
BillyTheKid2
joined 6 months ago
Then good news! Globally we're still over 2.1
Their plans don't include money like we have it today
You're a smarter human than me
That the ironing is very tasty
Yeah it's not going to be cheap, but I don't really care? A cheap one would suck.
It's not for everybody. Specifically I never recommend it.
There are plenty of full/long games now, and there are tools to effectively play a lot of pancake games in vr with full stereoscopic vision. GTAV in VR is hilarious.
It's not the lack of games preventing VR adoption, it's price, bulky tech, and inconsistent experience.
All jokes aside, nobody actually thinks chatbots will achieve sentience.
The most established engineers working on "AI" (I use this term because it's a common term, not because I support the term in this context) believe a combination of models - especially world models - will be what eventually achieves some semblance of sentience.
Even Anthropic, the Claude people, don't think LLMs will achieve sentience. They say they think LLMs are the path to machine sentience, which is a different thing.
But regardless, I believe von neumann architecture is insufficient to achieve sentience. I have no data to back up this belief.
I think NIMBYism is ok in some situations. I don't want an airport in my backyard, or a coal powerplant.
Personally I don't care if there is a DC near me, but I fully support people's right to not want it.
I trust telus to not give a shit about canadians
view more: next ›
He's right though. Double of nothing is...
Nothing