Then you'd also need to remove already successful "evergreen" titles in that case, which might land you back into the same. Not a lot of money for new games.
123
joined 9 months ago
Hyundai's and kias are known for costing more in labor and parts to repair (while taking a chance it might not work out) than a comparable car in working order.
No one should buy a product on a promise of future functionality. The answer is a clear "no" as of now.
Name and shame the brand?
They also advertise on the bay area in the US by the highways one time we drove by. Although compared to all the AI garbage companies that promise the world on their billboards, it was generic "protect your privacy - mullvad VPN" and something like that. I only remember it because of the mascot.
Top [number] [product/place] in [year].
Real travel videos for niche places are so annoying to find now.
Good luck finding a review of a niche product category among the slop lists.
Maybe, and there is some benefit for adding an off site backup, but the cost added up quickly. Each year they would have sent apple an extra $120 or so if they chose the wrong one because their plans conveniently jump from 200GB to 2TB.
"Always worked back at home" - x|
Once you use it and the shake camera they are very intuitive. I had a Moto G and it was great (other than the camera). I do like my current double press power for camera too, but options are nice.
A functional NFC payment check would be welcome. Hoping Motorola would have the pull to implement that either by getting Google Wallet's blessing or forcing them to. I really don't see why it is not considered a monopolistic practice since it gives Googles official OS an unfair advantage.
For regular people the 256GB starting SSD size is the biggest impendent. They won't be running adobe Photoshop, final cut, containers, etc, but they will all have a set of pictures they import from device to device. Clearly they are pushing people to the cloud backup option which they will forget and keep on their card for years to come.
Just earlier in the year I had someone ask why videos took more storage than pictures when I recommended they delete videos they didn't need/want to clear a lot of storage (mentioned videos are pictures stitched together to keep it simple, and live photos are a small burst of photos). The average consumer is not extrely knowledgeable and companies try to take advantage of that.
They had a bunch of unfocused fireworks/random events they will never watch again but are afraid to delete for each family/pet/friends video they would actually want forever.
My electric bill is already 2x+ that of the neighboring city due to data centers having an understanding with the for profit electric company that serves us. No thank you.