this post was submitted on 08 Aug 2025
1 points (100.0% liked)

Sustainable Tech

1258 readers
1 users here now

Sabaidee, Welcome!

This is a community for promoting sustainability in tech and computing. This includes: understanding the impact that our tech/computing choices have on the environment; purchasing or re-using devices that are sustainable and repairable; how to properly recycle or dispose of old devices when it is beyond use; and promoting software and services that allow us to reduce our environmental impact in the long term, both at work and in our personal lives.

This isn't a competition, it's a reminder to stay grounded when making your decisions. Remember: The most sustainable device is the one that you are already using.

Rules:

  1. Stay on-topic. Everything from sustainable smartphones to data centers and the green energy that powers them is fair game.
  2. Be excellent to each other.

Note: This is hosted on Lemmy at SDF. If you are browsing from the larger Fediverse, search for

[!sustainabletech@lemmy.sdf.org](/c/sustainabletech@lemmy.sdf.org)

and hit the Subscribe button.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/34131035

This is re solar, which is sustainable energy, so I'm cross-posting this here.

I asked Claude 4 opus (thinking) re sunlight hitting a solar cell. Per Claude, the infrared wavelengths near the visible light wavelengths are the most efficient. But a big part of the sunlight is visible light, so a big part of the electrical energy from a solar cell is from visible light.

Also, per Claude, "When light strikes an n-type monocrystalline silicon solar cell, photons must have sufficient energy to promote electrons from the valence band to the conduction band across silicon's bandgap. Silicon has a bandgap energy of approximately 1.12 electron volts (eV) at room temperature, which corresponds to a wavelength of about 1107 nanometers. This means photons with wavelengths longer than 1107 nm (energy less than 1.12 eV) cannot generate electron-hole pairs in silicon and pass through the material without contributing to electrical current. The relationship between photon energy and wavelength follows the equation E = hc/λ, where E is energy, h is Planck's constant, c is the speed of light, and λ is wavelength. Using this relationship, we can understand how different portions of the solar spectrum interact with silicon. Infrared radiation spans wavelengths from about 700 nm to 1 mm, with energies ranging from approximately 1.77 eV down to 0.001 eV. Only the near-infrared portion up to about 1107 nm can be absorbed by silicon. Photons in the 700-1107 nm range have energies between 1.77 and 1.12 eV, making them ideal for silicon solar cells as they have just enough energy to create electron-hole pairs with minimal excess energy lost as heat. Visible light extends from 400 to 700 nm, corresponding to energies of 3.1 to 1.77 eV. All visible photons have more than enough energy to overcome silicon's bandgap. However, the excess energy above 1.12 eV is largely wasted through thermalization, where hot carriers quickly lose their extra energy as heat. This fundamental thermalization loss limits the theoretical efficiency of single-junction silicon cells. Ultraviolet light, with wavelengths below 400 nm, carries energies above 3.1 eV. While UV photons are readily absorbed by silicon, their high excess energy results in significant thermalization losses. Additionally, UV photons are often absorbed very near the surface of the cell, where recombination rates are typically higher, further reducing their contribution to the cell's output current. The high surface recombination and thermalization losses make UV photons particularly inefficient for silicon solar cells despite their high energy."

I know re llm hallucination so I googled. I verified the energy formula and silicon's energy gap.

Has Claude been right?

top 1 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] sqw@lemmy.sdf.org 0 points 8 months ago

"i asked a bullshit generator about something technical and it spat out a screed of bullshit. any truth to it?" smh