this post was submitted on 31 Jul 2025
284 points (99.3% liked)

News

37731 readers
798 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Conor McGregor has lost his appeal against a civil jury finding in favour of Nikita Hand, who sued him over alleged rape of her in a Dublin hotel.

In its judgment on Thursday afternoon, the three judge Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal “in its entirety”. Ms Hand was in court for the ruling. Mr McGregor was not present.

Mr McGregor, who denied rape and claimed he had consensual and “vigorous” sex with Ms Hand in the Beacon hotel on December 9th 2018, had claimed the trial judge erred in directing the High Court civil jury should be asked to decide whether he “assaulted”, rather than “sexually assaulted”, Ms Hand.

Dismissing that ground of appeal, Mr Justice Brian O’Moore, sitting with Ms Justice Isobel Kennedy and Mr Justice Michael McGrath, said the appeal court had no doubt the overall effect of Mr Justice Alexander Owen’s charge was to tell them the central allegation by Ms Hand against Mr McGregor was he had raped her.

It was “unreal” to suggest that, after the trial judge had framed the issue in the “brutally clear” way he had, that the jury could have been confused.

Speaking outside the Four Courts in Dublin following the judgment, Ms Hand said “today I can finally move on and try to heal”.

top 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] HellsBelle@sh.itjust.works 25 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

One of the scuzziest human beings ever. And officially a rapist now.

Good.

[–] ddplf@szmer.info 21 points 9 months ago (1 children)

And he's running for presidency, isn't he?

[–] FarraigePlaisteach@lemmy.world 8 points 9 months ago

He’s not in the running, no. He would need enough nominations for that. But like all far right grifters, he’ll say anything.

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 11 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Did he only get a financial hit or did he do jail time? I'm out of the loop.

[–] ohulancutash@feddit.uk 18 points 9 months ago (1 children)
[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 9 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Right, so there wasn't a criminal trial, only a civil is what I'm guessing you're saying.

[–] dditty@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 9 months ago

Yup! He's officially legally a r*pist now

Man I remember when he was super popular and i would get downvoted by all the bros for saying he was a piece of shit and a racist and so many other things

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 9 points 9 months ago

So why haven't criminal charges been brought against him?

[–] z3rOR0ne@lemmy.ml 7 points 9 months ago (2 children)

What the actual fuck kind of society let's a proven in a court of law rapist pay a financial settlement and walk free? Oh right, I forgot, we're all dead and in Hell. Silly fucking me.

[–] TheLowestStone@lemmy.world 9 points 9 months ago

I'm not familiar with the legal system there but there's usually a different burden of prior between criminal and civil trails. Prosecutors declined to press criminal charges so it might be that there wasn't enough evidence to 100% conclusively prove that he did it.

[–] iopq@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

In criminal court you are presumed innocent and the prosecution must prove beyond reasonable doubt that you did it

[–] automaton@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago (2 children)

I'm not familiar with this specific legal system but how can a rape be tried as a civil matter?

[–] AngryishHumanoid@lemmynsfw.com 8 points 9 months ago

In most jurisdictions you have 2 kinds of courts, criminal and civil. Criminal is the government accusing a person or entity of breaking a law and saying they should be punished (fines, confinement, death, etc). Civil is a person or entity accusing another person or entity of harming them in some way and saying they should be punished with a fine. Both trials can technically happen at the same time but they tend to avoid doing that for various reasons.

Same way oj was tried civilly for murder and lost

[–] zero@fek.xyz 5 points 9 months ago

The Notorious Rapist.

[–] Ambersand@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Am I missing something, why aren't they criminal charges brought against him?

[–] iopq@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

Because they wouldn't convict him due to low quality of evidence