It shouldn't be hard to prove. He was talking about it on air at different points.
this post was submitted on 18 Jun 2025
636 points (98.9% liked)
News
37345 readers
96 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.
Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.
7. No duplicate posts.
If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.
All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
It's already proven and decided. Not only was it proven. He's continued to make the same claims post-judgement. Completely unrepentant.
It's getting him to actually pay the penalties that's turning out to be the difficult part.
He shifts assets to under his father's name. He lies about the size of his assets. He makes side deals with external funders to outbid buyers and gift assets back to him. He's just a bad dude.
I'm not talking about that part of it, I'm talking about the shifting of assets. He has openly talked about how he is doing that on the air.
Not just talking about it, bragging about how people shouldn't go to the IW store, but now Alex Jones Inc or some stupid garbage.
I really think he's trying to see how far he can go before he forced them to do something on air like he's been edging himself for over the last decade of secretly being the thing he's ranted about all these years.
It's the epitome of confidently incorrect. It's like he thinks he has found a loophole and is bragging about it.
We already know he lies on air. I'm not saying he's lying but him doing so to get more people to buy his shitty products is very plausible.
Lol everything he has done in these lawsuits was for the sole purpose to hide his money.
5 different corporate representatives were sent and the court ruled every single testimony of those as non responsive to discovery. The last corporate rep to testify was a hired outside lawyer with no experience in civil law, no familiarity with Texas law and had no experience in financial matters. Why would you send someone as your corporate representative, who has no idea what's going on, or any experience in relevant fields? To obscure the process of discovery and to hide the money.
Dan over at Knowledge Fight has been cataloging how Alex has been working to (lazily) shield his assets for at least a year or two now. He's barely trying to hide it at all, and is basically telegraphing this on air and almost feels like he's trying to give them more ammo against him, but he is also very stupid.
Some sodomite sent me a bucket of poop.
I'm not mad at the crew
And here come the sex robots
I RENOUNCE JESUS CHRIST!
Perhaps he's lazily hiding some of his assets in plain and obvious ways to throw the courts off the scent of stuff he's shielding more effectively and discretely.
I'm tired of them pretending they're the good guys saying we're the bad guys.
I love you.
Knowing Alex, no shock.
He owes $1.5 billion. He shouldn't have anything, ANYTHING. Take everything he has, and leave him homeless, penniless, and naked.
Thanks but we don’t want to see him naked
Once he's naked, he would need to he arrested again for indecent exposure.
They’ve mentioned fraud. Is this a criminal trial? Please be a criminal trial!
Different right wing nut job. This one is the one about chem trails.
Literally just need to hire a PI to follow him and you’ll get lots of proof of what he’s hiding
Just listen to the show. He has been openly transferring customers to a different store that is "completely unrelated" to Alex Jones companies and he "doesn't have a stake in". Except that it's his dad's website and all the paperwork is in the names of employees of Alex. He wasn't even trying to hide it. Completely, nakedly trying to hide assets.
They are just going to play him back to himself in court and say to his lawyer "is this your client?" Open and shut case.
Looks at the calendar
I mean he clearly has shielded them since there's still no payout. Incredible journalism.
Because Infowars’ assets are still tied up in the courts, Jones has been allowed to continue broadcasting his shows and hawking merchandise from Infowars’ Austin studio.
Well that's infuriating. Also bonus points for the AP trying to stay neutral and then throwing in the word "hawking".
That's a tiny hand
IANAL but it seems like he’s really skirting the law here. Like I think it can be a felony.