this post was submitted on 19 Oct 2026
-2 points (48.8% liked)

Ask Lemmy

41974 readers
1098 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, toxicity and dog-whistling are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !uspolitics@lemmy.world


7) No Hit-and-Run questions.
Please don't delete your post for no apparent reason. If you plan on deleting a question later, say so in the post, or if you feel that you have a good reason to remove it, message a mod beforehand. It's not fair to the ones who took their time to answer, and it's not in the spirit of the community.


8) No Bots.
Posts or comments from bots, LLM's, AIs, Neural Networks, Transformers, or Marvin the Paranoid Android are not welcome in AskLemmy. Real humans only please.


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I noticed almost everybody here agrees that all AI is bad, and anything produced by AI is slop. and refuse to use any software made in part or in whole with AI or help of AI? Please mention your background and usage of AI with your answer.

I also posted it here.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] cb900f_bodhi@fedinsfw.app 1 points 1 day ago

I wanted to add, since I haven't seen anyone else mention it, I also hate AI and refuse to use it because it is the focal point of the biggest stock market bubble, pump-and-dump scam, that we have ever seen. When it pops, it will dwarf the housing market crash of 2007ish. It is so blatantly obvious to so many of us and we are powerless to stop it beyond boycotting and repeatedly voicing the flaws, failures and misinformation rampantly circulating the LLM technology. I hate "AI" for all the reasons everyone else has stated, but I also hate it for what the AI bubble will inevitably do to the worldwide economy and anyone who doesn't have a million dollar safety net.

I also hate "AI" because a LLM is not AI at all. Not in the sense of a general artificial intelligence. AI was a label applied to LLMs by marketing douchebags to hype their bullshit machine. But this is false. LLMs are not AI, they are not intelligent. But LLMs present the illusion of intelligence and that is enough to keep the game of musical chairs going, for now.

[–] Fleppensteijn@sh.itjust.works 43 points 4 days ago (1 children)

They claim to automate the work so we have more time to focus on imporant things. Has this ever happened? We got computers, productivity went up, and we still work 40 hours and are poorer than previous generations. In a time of climate crises, they take our dwindling resources so people can create stupid images and videos. I want to see creativity being shared.

Besides, everything AI learned is stolen from people who put the work in. I want people to visit my website, that I worked hard on. I don't want some LLM telling you what it "learned" from my work. I know search engines purposely make their results crap so the only way to get information is to use an LLM nowadays and I admit I use LLMs for that reason. I can't just google what I need anymore most of the time.

[–] Fallibilist@feddit.uk 11 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (3 children)

Has this ever happened?

Doing laundry used to be among the most time-consuming household tasks. Washing machine at the time probably offered women more liberty than the pill did.

Most workplaces pay for your time anyway - not output.

[–] Fleppensteijn@sh.itjust.works 21 points 4 days ago (11 children)

And then what happened? Double income couples have to squeeze in time for laundry in the weekend.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 6 points 4 days ago (4 children)

My feeling is im not sure much has increased quality of life since the 70's. The only thing I can point to is maybe the microwave.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Nefara@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

It was a time consuming task but it was one done as a job. Cleaning clothes was a whole industry, and getting your clothes laundered was generally affordable and something you could pay others to do for you. The washing machine allows people to do it themselves easier, but with needing to buy the machine, paying for detergent and additives, water use, keeping up with maintenance, it's not for free. What the washing machine did was take away an industry where people had paying jobs to do the task, and turn the task into a self-care obligation that locks you into consumership. Can you make your own washing machine? Your own detergent? You have to buy those things and then do the labor yourself, unpaid. Who really benefited? The laundry industry was a tough one to work in but it was a paid job for the working class. It's now a way for corporations to make money off of unpaid labor.

[–] Fallibilist@feddit.uk 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Paying for someone else to wash your clothes was a luxury for the rich and upper middle class back then just like it is today. This was not an option for the large majority of households.

Laundry was overwhelmingly unpaid household labor, done mainly by women, and it was one of the most time-consuming and physically demanding domestic tasks. Doing a single load by hand could take the better part of a day of heating water, scrubbing, rinsing, wringing, and ironing. Once electric machines became common, that work collapsed to a small fraction of the previous hours and physical effort

[–] Nefara@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Like a lot of things that's very location dependent. Geographical region, level of development, point in history etc. You and I are both correct, for example my scenario is accurate to ancient Rome or a pre-industrial European village, your scenario is true in 19th century Western American homesteaders or deeply rural communities. A similar thing happened with sewing machines where the invention of a modern tool outsourced a skilled, paid job (making clothes) to unpaid domestic labor. Did some individuals without prior access to those professional services benefit? Of course, but it meant that the bespoke clothing industry and the clothes laundering industries both deflated to the point of not being widely or cheaply available anymore, and the labor that once was a paid job was expected to be done for free.

My point was that it is not such an easy thing to point to that instantly made everyone's lives better.

[–] justdaveisfine@piefed.social 42 points 4 days ago (3 children)

The Fediverse is generally-to-strongly anti-corporate. 98% of LLM AI is owned/controlled by corporations.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] sem@piefed.blahaj.zone 33 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (3 children)

I can't speak for the community, however in 2022 when ChatGPT was in development, lots of us were excited about it. When ChatGPT came out, and the image AIs came out, I tried them and was pretty impressed at first. However as I learned more about them and time went on, I learned to not like them, and avoid them. This is what happened:

  • I realized that ChatGPT would make subtle mistakes that were impossible to catch if you didn't have expert knowledge
  • I wasted a lot of time using AI trying to get it to give me right answers
  • People at work used ChatGPT to make subtle mistakes which negatively affected me
  • I learned about how writers and artists were having their work stolen and put into these large models without their consent
  • I learned about the environmental costs
  • Computer hardware started getting stupidly expensive :(
  • I learned how using AI can make you rely on it, and you lose critical thinking skills.
  • I have seen people in the real world defer to "AI" as an authority on a subject.
  • I learned how many of the AI tech bros sincerely believe their own hype and think that Advanced General Intelligence is going to develop out of the same tech as llm and pose a threat to humanity and/or save humanity
  • Companies have started using AI to make customer service worse
  • Small businesses turned to AI to make awful flyers and menues which make my experience in the world worse
  • Bosses use AI as a way to fire people and or control the workforce better
  • The surveillance state is using AI to destroy privacy

So that's why i don't like it and try not to use it any more.

[–] Bougie_Birdie@piefed.blahaj.zone 13 points 4 days ago (1 children)

First point is quite important. In some cases it's merely nuisance, but in the extreme it could cause a fatal error. Reminds me of a parable:

An astronomer keeps a subscription to a newspaper, and uses it to keep informed about politics, world issues, etc. One day the astronomer is excited to see that their paper is running an article on space: planets and stars and black holes and shit. Excited, they flip over to the article to see what they have to say and how they're educating people. They're shocked at the contents. They had expected that the paper would dumb things down with metaphor or layman's terms but it's worse than that - key parts of the article are factually, demonstrably, and completely wrong. Maybe not "Sun revolves around the Earth" stuff, but easily verifiable things and common misconceptions.

Realizing how badly the paper does within a field they know intimately, the astronomer cancels their subscription. If the newspaper reports about special interests are so wrong, they clearly aren't a good source of truth for the things that matter.

AI provides the output of that newspaper dialed up to a million percent by volume.

[–] MufinMcFlufin@lemmy.world 7 points 4 days ago

My boss used to work in auto repair and loves sharing stories about how ChatGPT is very wrong about error codes for certain cars, many times in a way that's very easy to look up.

He then nearly spent $1000 on parts that would have been totally useless to the company because he couldn't be bothered to read the spec sheet and trusted ChatGPT to tell him which part we needed rather than the person actually working on that project.

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 7 points 4 days ago (14 children)

Your first bullet point is why I encourage people if they are going to use it to use it for something they know really well or will see the effects where mistakes are not going to be that bad with consequences (video games). I don't think anyone should use it for things they don't know till they get a good idea of how it performs on things they do.

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] dragnucs@lemmy.ml 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

That is a reasonable list I 100% agree with you. Many of them are part of my experience. Especially as using AI as an authority. You can't even convince them otherwise.

However, I've got a question for you: have you noticed any good or correct usage of AI.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] otacon239@lemmy.world 31 points 4 days ago (1 children)

This is just a starting point, but the insane amount of pollution and constant disregard for a better way of doing things was the first reason I dropped it. Even if it was a good, reliable product, the way it’s produced is egregious and wasteful: https://youtu.be/t-8TDOFqkQA

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] scytale@piefed.zip 20 points 4 days ago

The lemmy userbase consists of a lot of people who work or dabble in tech, a larger % than most other forums and social media. That means more people here have directly used AI for their day-to-day technical tasks/jobs, not your typical social media user who just uses AI to generate memes or do their school essay. So they have first hand experience of how inaccuracies with AI have larger consequences than 6 fingers on a hand.

[–] Elting@piefed.social 22 points 4 days ago (15 children)

Same reason that Luddites hated the textile factories. Its a tool but its the kind of tool that distances us from our work in a way that undermines our collective humanity.

load more comments (15 replies)
[–] Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 20 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I’m against AI for two main reasons: it’s a giant plagiarism machine built on the theft of the labor of millions, and it has disastrous environmental consequences in the form of rapid, giant data center deployment. (No, I am not impressed by whining about how all the internet uses data centers, build out and energy consumption remained modest until about 4 years ago). These are fundamental problems with the current implementation of the technology and I see no realistic way to change that, so I don’t see myself ever using it even if I did find it useful, which I don’t.

The only thing I’ve ever cared to have an “AI” do for me is answer incredibly niche questions that would take ages to figure out on my own, or require tracking down really obscure books, etc. But the nature of LLMs being ‘guess the next statistically most likely word’ means that it’s never going to be good for that. I can read on my own, I can write my own emails, and since I’m not a programmer I’m not stupid enough to fuck with code I don’t understand to do something a solution probably already exists for, if all the unmaintained vibe coded garbage hasn’t drowned it out. I don’t want a machine deciding what search results to show me, so I don’t use it as a search engine. I guess if I did more work with data it could maybe format it for me when I needed to make changes, but that would require trusting it not to randomly change parts of the data (which I don’t). So yeah, useless for me.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] EpicFailGuy@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

people that actively move to a federated community because their last one got enshitified tend to be against centralized platforms and are hyper aware of the potential for enshitification.

What could be more centralized (and enshitified) than AI? It's literally consuming content and regurgitating back to you.

[–] Strider@lemmy.world 16 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Decades it pro, working on central stuff.

The current ai aka LLM is based on an illegal foundation, has high training and running resource cost and produces results that everyone in their field has to at least rework. This is while there are comparatively lightweight solutions that produce good results.

Not even mentioning the environmental and financial impact.

So yeah it's a tool and can be trained and used for useful things but it's sold as the solution for everything (especially them milking money) by the tech bros which it is absolutely not, leaving a wake of destruction and massive brain drain.

The worst part is that superficially it looks the part and higher ups in the business ate the most gullible people.

[–] JustPlainDave@lemmy.zip 12 points 4 days ago (2 children)

It doesn't seem to have much use. Supposedly we're all going to have AI do our work for us and we'll have more free time, which is the biggest load of bullshit I've ever seen.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Broadfern@lemmy.world 12 points 4 days ago

Locally hosted models are less egregious than corporate cloud models that actively harvest and monitor your data.

Corporate AI feeds the surveillance machine, that in turn is used to suppress dissent.

That and GenAI output in anything creative or market-based gets very same-y and gives the end user an impression of the creator not caring to put in effort. Perceived low effort = spam.

Lastly, genAI gets pushed into everything. It’s a matter of simple oversaturation and it gets exhausting to have it seemingly everywhere. Not having the option to turn it off becomes, well, a turnoff. 🤷🏻

If you make slop you have to prove that it’s not slop, not the other way around

[–] Zwuzelmaus@feddit.org 7 points 4 days ago

almost everybody here agrees that all AI is bad

If your eyes look only in black and white, then you believe that all people were actually only black and white as well. Even when they are colorful, you don't recognize that.

[–] Fallibilist@feddit.uk 7 points 4 days ago (2 children)

It's not nearly everyone. Possibly not even the majority. It's just the ones who do tend to be very vocal about it.

My understanding is that it stems from the opposition against big tech in general. The reasons for being against AI are not dissimilar to the reasons why they oppose Facebook, Google, Twitter and such.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] TryingToBeGood@reddthat.com 0 points 2 days ago

Because everybody is?

[–] Adniem@thelemmy.club 4 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

well i sometimes use ai (sorry i hope i will stop using it sometime soon) but because nobody wants a machine to do everything if it did everything humans wont have a productive way to spend their time (not accurate since i am not 100 percent against ai)

and also it justifies big tech control (nothing in this post was written by AI)

and a lot more

load more comments
view more: next ›