this post was submitted on 28 Apr 2025
0 points (50.0% liked)

Showerthoughts

42126 readers
359 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The most popular seem to be lighthearted clever little truths, hidden in daily life.

Here are some examples to inspire your own showerthoughts:

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. No politics
    • If your topic is in a grey area, please phrase it to emphasize the fascinating aspects, not the dramatic aspects. You can do this by avoiding overly politicized terms such as "capitalism" and "communism". If you must make comparisons, you can say something is different without saying something is better/worse.
    • A good place for politics is c/politicaldiscussion
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct and the TOS

If you made it this far, showerthoughts is accepting new mods. This community is generally tame so its not a lot of work, but having a few more mods would help reports get addressed a little sooner.

Whats it like to be a mod? Reports just show up as messages in your Lemmy inbox, and if a different mod has already addressed the report, the message goes away and you never worry about it.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I guess? But it's also morally just to reuse disposables, repair instead of replace, conserve and reduce waste, and delay new purchases as long as possible. I'm doing environmental conservationism just by being poor!

[–] underline960@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The reason that the rich were so rich, Vimes reasoned, was because they managed to spend less money. Take boots, for example. ... A really good pair of leather boots cost fifty dollars. But an affordable pair of boots, which were sort of OK for a season or two and then leaked like hell when the cardboard gave out, cost about ten dollars. ... But the thing was that good boots lasted for years and years. A man who could afford fifty dollars had a pair of boots that'd still be keeping his feet dry in ten years' time, while a poor man who could only afford cheap boots would have spent a hundred dollars on boots in the same time and would still have wet feet. This was the Captain Samuel Vimes 'Boots' theory of socio-economic unfairness. (Terry Pratchett, Men at Arms)

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The rich will throw away their perfectly fine boots after a few years because they aren't in style anymore.

[–] timmy_dean_sausage@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The rich have that option.

[–] lord_ryvan@ttrpg.network 0 points 1 year ago

I read “The rich have that opinion.” at first and that somehow fits just as well.

[–] IsoSpandy@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is the single greatest example I have seen highlighting the problem.

The poor cannot afford to have things that last, things that allow them to think of the future, and hence are stuck in a cycle of debt in the present to near future time periods.

However what I don't understand is how the rich get so short sighted when they have both the motivation and resources to plan for long term outcomes. Doesn't make sense.

Underpaying workers leads to worse productivity and apathy towards your superiors.

Does the world really have so few resources that the only way to keep number go up is to exploit the less fortunate? When will feudalism truly end?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] OpenStars@piefed.social 0 points 1 year ago

They can choose not to.

[–] OldManBOMBIN@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (12 children)

Seems like there's plenty of entitled wealthy people in this thread. People who don't understand what it's like to be systemically pushed down into the mud; what it's like when all of your choices are either bad or worse.

"But you can recycle..." Shut the fuck up dude, recycling doesn't feed my fucking family. Recycling doesn't replace the years spent in an education system that's designed to make you a factory worker. Recycling doesn't bring living-wage-paying jobs to my hometown.

When the bills are in the mail, the tax man is coming, the landlord's raising the rent, and the bossman is driving a new car every year but can't pay you enough to keep your bank account from overdrafting, sometimes you have to do "immoral" shit.

Sometimes you have to kill an animal with no hunting license, sometimes you have to find a place to stay warm for the night, sometimes you have to feed your kids when all you have is cardboard and that might mean stealing bread from the dollar store.

[–] Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

warning satireAre you sure your not just being lazy? Maybe it was the choices you made that landed you there. It's not like there is a whole system in place to oppress a certain class of people.

[–] OldManBOMBIN@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I cannot believe that you're being downvoted. This place disappoints me.

[–] Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I was told I'm a politician in another thread so... yeah I don't know man.

[–] OldManBOMBIN@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

Looks like the consensus finally turned around somewhat

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] carlossurf@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 year ago

This is true and I am saying that as someone who is well off, the movie parasite talks about this great. Its easy to be a nice person when your rich

[–] undeffeined@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] OldManBOMBIN@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

Well this is getting added to my playlist.

Dude looks like Tyler Cassidy's nephew or something.

[–] BussyCat@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

So you listed a bunch of things that make sense for illegal things you might have to do in order to acquire food but just because you are poor why can’t you recycle?

[–] OldManBOMBIN@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (3 children)

That's not the point.

The point is that doing little things like reducing reusing and recycling are not the end-all be-all solution to being broke. I'm saying that doing moral things doesn't automatically give you a liveable life; it doesn't magically make everything ok.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Poor people are excellent recyclers. Even in states that don't offer bottle exchange they will collect for the aluminum/other alloys, alone.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] idriss@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago

I remember the millionaire who wanted to prove that he could rebuild his wealth if he started from scratch again. He cheated a little bit because he used his friend apartment for free.

Fast forward, he gave up after a couple of months and understood what the rest of us knew for ages.

Wealthy people are delusional and no amount of reasoning will work with them.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] bunkyprewster@startrek.website 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Honestly, rich people are pretty shitty themselves.

[–] mogranja@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

But not for lack of choice, that's the point here.

[–] daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

People is bad or good. Money don't have that much factor in that. It only changes the type of "bad things" you do, but bad people will do bad things and good people will do good things.

Don't fall for the sentient that all poor are good and all rich are bad, or that all rich are good and all poor are bad. Because that doesn't correlate with really.

Yes, maybe a poor bad fella will stab you, while a bad rich guy will deny your medical insurance. They both are taking your life, different approaches to evilness due different disposable income available to do evil shit.

[–] stembolts@programming.dev 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm rich and I love stabbing. Stop excluding me from your straw men arguments.

[–] dbtng@eviltoast.org 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No. For your stabby crimes, you are henceforth condemned to deny other's their medical insurance. And other evil shit.

[–] stembolts@programming.dev 0 points 1 year ago

Noooooo, I just wanna make people leaky.. FINE! I'll commit social-murder, but I won't be happy about it. (grumbles) Gna go play my rogue in Oblivion gonna stab everybody.. (Harumph..)

[–] dbtng@eviltoast.org 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sentiment. The word is sentiment.

A sentient is an intelligent being. You are a sentient. One might fall for a sentient, but then they would have to consider wedding plans.

[–] daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Thanks!

Sometimes I have issues spelling these similar looking English words.

[–] TimewornTraveler@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm sorry but this is fucking stupid. WHO is calling WHAT immoral? Someone babbling on recycling, who the fuck cares about recycling?

Poorest people are 100% capable of making choices that align with their personal values as anyone else. This is such a fucking Christian thread. What, do you think morals come from the Bible? what a joke

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Randomgal@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Don't use being poor to justify your shitty choices bro, wtf? Trash take.

[–] daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 year ago

According to Lemmy all poor people are good.

Tell that to Juan, the homeless I personally know that has not done anything bad, and have been always an angel. He had never hurt or steal anyone and he doesn't even have a roof over his head.

But according to Lemmy shitheads that kill, steal and rape have the same moral merit as Juan because they are not rich.

[–] Shanmugha@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (23 children)

Wait till you realize morality is shitty fucked up crutch that doesn't work at best and a tool to control people at... usual, not even the worst

[–] dbtng@eviltoast.org 0 points 1 year ago

This is a word salad that I can support.

load more comments (22 replies)
[–] forkDestroyer@infosec.pub 0 points 1 year ago

I understand where you're coming from, because many societies are being structured in ways that make it feel like you are only hurting yourself by not being just and moral. It's truly horrible when trying to live a life following "the good" puts you in the path of pain all the time, working jobs you don't want to afford not to be put out on the street (and God forbid you want to have kids if you're in a high cost of living area).

With all that being said: I'd fear becoming an evil person more than dying poor. I hope that we can work together to make a world that isn't run by greedy, bad people.

[–] Phoenicianpirate@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago

I think it was Mark Twain who said that in order for a man to be moral he needs to be well-fed first.

[–] daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

According to Lemmy poor people who have done not harm to others have the same morals that poor people that hurt others.

I personally know a homeless person that have never steal or hurt. And several poor people with homes but small income that have stab and stolen other people.

According to some out of touch lemmings those two person are morally equivalent.

Being poor doesn't justify being a shit person. And defending that is insulting to honest and moral poor people.

[–] Railcar8095@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I guess you can always find "some" people that can fit with your strawman, doesn't really make it a valid argument.

"Some people" on Lemmy think the earth is flat. "Some" are pedophiles. "Some" are even Republicans. That doesn't mean they are correct or common.

[–] daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

What are you implying is the strawman?

The millions of honest and dishonest poor and rich people that prove that morals are not related to money? Or the statically significant lemmings that agree with "all poor are good because they are poor" ?

[–] Railcar8095@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The part were you say a significant amount of people on Lemmy think that stabbing others is morally correct if you're poor.

And just to be clear, in not implying, I'm telling it plain and open.

[–] Seleni@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

? Pretty sure that’s not what they said.

They said that there are people on Lemmy who think a person who stabs someone vs a person who doesn’t are morally equivalent—as long as they’re both poor.

Very different.

They did also say that there are poor people who stab others and blame their actions on being poor, but that was tangential to their main point about judging the morals of a person solely based on their wealth or lack thereof.

[–] dbtng@eviltoast.org 0 points 1 year ago

Oh no! You put republicans in my showerthoughts. Oh, that's a strange mix.

I think I'm gonna puke.

load more comments
view more: next ›