this post was submitted on 15 Sep 2026
373 points (98.4% liked)

Privacy

51614 readers
753 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 7 years ago
MODERATORS
 

They met at a bar in midtown Manhattan. He arrived wearing a baseball cap pulled low and sported a pair of black-framed glasses, she says. As conversation flowed, from discussions about navigating life in New York to past relationships, he mentioned that his glasses were Meta Ray-Bans.

“I wasn’t familiar with them,” McAnuff, a 28-year-old project manager who now lives in Toronto, tells WIRED. It was her first time seeing the smart glasses up close, which can record images and video from the wearer’s viewpoint. He let her try them on and even showed her a couple of videos that he’d taken previously, she says. “That was it. We stopped talking about it after that. I figured that was the end of the use.”

The next day, checking her Instagram, McAnuff noticed she’d been tagged in one of his story posts. To her surprise, it was footage of them at the bar and on the subway together, en route to a basketball game uptown. In the video, McAnuff is captured from an above angle, sitting across from her date who is holding a drinking glass; WIRED has seen screenshots of the footage. “I felt super violated,” McAnuff says. “Like, what if I don’t want everyone knowing what I’m up to? He felt so free to film me and post it. There was no conversation about it.”

Meta sold more than 7 million pairs of the Ray-Bans in 2025, as its smart glasses have infiltrated public spaces thanks to pranksters with dreams of viral fame, some of whom even film people while they’re at work. The phenomenon, which has also spread to pickup artists hitting on women, has earned the hardware the nickname “creep glasses.”

Among singles, and particularly women, Meta’s AI-powered eyewear has become a recurring nuisance, as people share a spreading unease about being covertly filmed on dates.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Ice@lemmy.zip 134 points 1 month ago (3 children)

~~Men~~ Wearing Meta Glasses ~~on Dates~~ Is an Instant Red Flag

[–] lemmur420@lemmy.ml 14 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Pol Pot be like: ~~Men~~ Wearing ~~Meta~~ Glasses ~~on Dates~~ Is an Instant Red Flag

[–] StumblingWasabi@lemmy.today 9 points 1 month ago

Its times like this I'm glad I got frameless glasses

[–] reptar@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago

That was my first though, yeah ...

On dates does add to it though

[–] huppakee@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I've read this story about it where the people who bought them stopped wearing them within a few weeks because they felt uncomfortable wearing them - common theme was, when people notice you were those glasses they shun you and find an excuse to end the conversation. Guess people in general agree with you.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] IpsumLauren@lemmy.world 66 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I thought the convention was to call them "perv glasses"?

[–] unitedwithme@lemmy.today 21 points 1 month ago
[–] Bluegrass_Addict@lemmy.ca 63 points 1 month ago (29 children)

*people wearing creep glasses is a red flag

load more comments (29 replies)
[–] Lemmchen@feddit.org 62 points 1 month ago (9 children)

How fucked up do you have to be to wear these to a date?

[–] gedfromgont@piefed.ca 15 points 1 month ago

I am sure they go well with those apps that generate naked versions of people. Surely they exist for video as well.

[–] Malica@lemmy.zip 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

People evidently wear them on dates then feed the footage to ai in order to improve their game.

[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago

Narrator: It doesn't work.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Sanguine@lemmy.dbzer0.com 31 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Where is the "hue hue people have cameras in their phone and you have no problem with that, checkmate" guy...I know you're in here.

The Instagram part of the story perfectly highlights the difference. Busting out a camera to start filming the entire date so I can make a highlight reel later is way more conspicuous than simply wearing my glasses. One leads to a discussion while the other is inconspicuous and likely never had consent in the first place.

[–] AnAmericanPotato@programming.dev 17 points 1 month ago (1 children)

This is the only sane take on perv glasses.

If someone pulled out their phone to photograph me on our first date, I'd nip that in the bud, and maybe just walk away. I guess I might be okay if there was a scenic background and they said "want to get a selfie together?" but a photo just of me across the table? Creepy.

[–] Sanguine@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 1 month ago

And with a conversation about it all that can be laid out and consented to.

Hey this view is really pretty can we take a selfie? Sure!

Later that evening: Hey that photo came out good, do you mind if I post it to my Instagram? I'd prefer if you didn't.

Okay no problem.

It doesn't need to be any more complicated than this.

[–] joseki@lemmy.zip 10 points 1 month ago

Yeah im a huge nerd and techno-weenie but this is just creepy abuser behavior and a major red flag if it wasn't consented to im advance

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] moldy_rice@piefed.keyboardvagabond.com 26 points 1 month ago (4 children)

7 million? People actually bought this?

Jeez there's a lot of perverts in the world

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] ScoffingLizard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 25 points 1 month ago

Anyone wearing these anywhere is a huge red flag.

[–] rekabis@lemmy.ca 19 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

Pervert glasses.

They’re called pervert glasses.

Get it right, Wired.

And let’s also lay it all out: the only people wearing them are sick enough in the head to need immediate institutionalization. Full stop, end of story.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 15 points 1 month ago (1 children)

My Meta Glasses memeable thought of the day:

If you feel violated when a private citizen follows you around with a camera, might want to also feel violated when the state follows you around with millions of cameras.

[–] heartSagan5@lemmy.zip 9 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Right. Flock, et al. are a violation of our 4th Amendment rights. These “autonomous deputies” are annotating our movements and our private vehicles.

[–] Zensate@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago

Oh, how fun. Now we'll all be even more repressed because literally every interaction will be recorded and you better not do anything cringe.

[–] Sanctus@anarchist.nexus 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Velma Idk what it is about your post but they seem to make the misogynists crawl out of the network. Always multiple people telling on themselves in the comments. Not every post with "Men" in the title needs someone saying "b-but women!"

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] helix@feddit.org 10 points 1 month ago (5 children)

So you mean if I buy these I don't have to talk to people? Where do I sign up?

[–] MajorMajormajormajor@lemmy.ca 17 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The key is buying a pair of regular glasses that look similar enough, and put some logo stickers on to fake it. Then, you don't support evil, and you still don't have to talk to people. Win win!

[–] grey_maniac@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I would advise against this. The time is coming where people wearing perv glasses are going to be encountering bats to the face. BTW, I also know of a couple of people working on adversarial QR codes to attack the glasses' systems.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] 9point6@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago (1 children)

You know you can just not talk to people, you don't have to creep people out to achieve that goal

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Broadfern@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

What’s wrong with good old fashioned headphones/mean mug?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] mangobanana@discuss.online 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I'm old enough to remember when Google came out with their version. People went appoleptic and cried invasion of privacy. What happened, why were these not shunned in the same way? It's our because they just look like sun glasses? The only acceptable use for these is to aide blind people

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›