this post was submitted on 10 Sep 2026
1 points (100.0% liked)

Rant

525 readers
5 users here now

A place where you can rant to your heart's content.

Rules :
  1. Follow all of Lemmy code of conduct.
  2. Be respectful to others, even if they're the subject of your rant. Realize that you can be angry at someone without denigrating them.
  3. Keep it on Topic. Memes about ranting are allowed for now, but will be banned if they start to become more prevalent than actual rants.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

And I feel guilty as I type this because maybe I could be doing more to solve some of these problems, but individual action only goes so far. Some of the world's problems would take collective action to really fix.

If everyone were on the same page and priorities straight, climate change could've been solved by now. Again, not trying to shame individuals. We should all do our best to reduce our carbon footprint but a real solution would require coordinated effort by society getting its priorities in order and realizing the future of civilization is more important than money

And speaking of money, poverty and homelessness shouldn't exist anymore. We should have universal basic income and free housing, it would save money in the long run and make life better for everybody, but we can't have that because some people are stuck on the notion that we can't give stuff to people who don't earn it. Unless they're born rich.

And the inevitable AI disaster wouldn't be inevitable if we could all collectively just stop building it. But we can't have that can we? Cause countries don't trust eachother not to keep building it. And rich people.

And the frigging fascist takeover of America and probable oncoming genocide against various minority groups in America would be so easily prevented if the fucking government dud its fucking job and enforced the rules, but too many of them are criminals

It's all preventable but isn't being prevented because society fucking sucks. Especially capitalist society. Humanity as a whole didn't deserve to survive the pandemic cause we suck. At least that's what I'll tell myself to feel better while civilization collapses. Maybe we fucking deserve it.

But then a part of me is still optimistic. Humanity has survived a lot more than we deserve to. Every generation ever has believed they were in the end times. Maybe we'll survive all of this and come out better than before. Keep some hope alive. If I should die in a concentration camp or be killed by robots, I want to die with at least a little hope in my heart that the future will be better

top 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] antlion@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 2 days ago

All of the problems are really only one problem: greed. Therefore the fix is relatively straightforward: identify the egregious hoarders and reallocate their assets. Let me know when you have a list together, we’ll start the revolution.

[–] Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe 0 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

"If everyone were on the same page"

Yea, like that could ever happen. This is a denial of fundamental human nature.

Even worse is your hubris in assuming the priorities you believe are "right" everyone else should agree with you.

So no, most problems aren't preventable, just the opposite - they're endemic to humanity.

[–] theuniqueone@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 2 days ago

"Human Nature" doesn't exist all history has shown what is called "human nature" is nothing but changeable societal enforced ideals.

[–] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 0 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

You don't think society collectively should prioritize making sure our species doesn't die a horrific preventable death?

After the last fish is caught and the last tree dies and the last river poisoned, we'll finally realize we can't eat money.

Society is collectively refusing to prevent our doom because of imaginary, socially constructed, economic restrictions

I word it this way to emphasize that I understand that right now it isn't feasible for some individuals to prioritize preventing climate change over their own economic survival. It would require wide societal change of priorities

you might not be able to eat money, but you can use it to build climate controlled greenhouses and fisheries

[–] vrek@programming.dev 0 points 2 days ago (2 children)

People don't think that way.

  1. I know I shouldn't work for evil Inc but I need to pay rent next month.

  2. Yeah but that won't be an issue for many years so I'll be far past dead and it's someone else's issue.

  3. If I can set it up so my children control the last source of fresh water in the area they will be powerful and envied. My lineage will continue far into the future.

Yes working cooperatively would be beneficial but most people prioritize themselves.

[–] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 0 points 2 days ago

That's my point. It's very difficult to ask people on an individual level to prioritize the environment, which is why it woukd require societal cooperation

[–] theuniqueone@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Except this is just not true for the vast majority of humanity its not "human nature" but socially upheld material culture.

[–] vrek@programming.dev 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] theuniqueone@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The vast majority of human existence before the rise of "civilization" for one.

[–] vrek@programming.dev 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

So you are guessing about society 7000 years ago?

[–] theuniqueone@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 2 days ago

No anthropology and similar fields give us a decent idea, even until the past decades the San people still showed an example of this.