Found the one person where sleep works on Linux
this post was submitted on 02 Sep 2026
34 points (97.2% liked)
Linux
67398 readers
557 users here now
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).
Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.
Rules
- Posts must be relevant to operating systems running the Linux kernel. GNU/Linux or otherwise.
- No misinformation
- No NSFW content
- No hate speech, bigotry, etc
Related Communities
Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0
founded 7 years ago
MODERATORS
lol sleep works just fine for me , even have a keyboard that has a sleep button, Guix system, Linux kernel, niri window manager. Volume buttons and pause , play do too. Sleep and hibernate has worked for awhile .
I’m not certain of the last time I had hardware where sleep didn’t just work in Linux. It’s fine in my oldest laptop that only has limited hardware support for sleep modes and extremely good on everything else.
i wonder how often the proprietary stuff is artificial given that examples like nvidia -- their stuff is literally built and tested on linux, but they refuse to support it nonetheless.
Have you tried Kdenlive for video editing?
Have you tried Lightworks? The free version is less than useless because it limits export to 720p, but it includes all the codecs. Available as a deb, rpm and flatpak. And it's European - sort of (originally based in the UK, now owned by an American parent company) It's the other Hollywood tested editing program for Linux
Video Editing (Free DaVinci Resolve): Free Resolve on Linux lacks native H.264/H.265 MP4 decoding due to licensing. It requires running FFmpeg scripts to transcode footage to ProRes/DNxHR before editing.
If you're editing MP4 directly, you're an amateur who has no business editing anything. MP4 is a compressed finalized format suitable for distribution. It gives you virtually zero wiggle room for color correction, etc...
There's a reason professionals shoot log and shoot in a RAW format that is made specifically for editing. It's only when the project is ready to be exported should you be going anywhere near MP4.
If you're commenting on Lemmy directly, you're an amateur who has no business writing any text ever. There's a reason professionals use text editors to write books.
Jokes aside, you're sounding very gatekeeping here.
The writer of the video is (presumably) a paid, working writer. And as such they should know better.
it's like a car reviewer saying "its a friction point that it won't win the Grand Prix" when he's reviewing an '81 Chevette.
The writer of the video is (presumably) a paid, working writer.
Why do you think that? To me, it just seems to be a guy with a YouTube account. He's got exactly three videos listed, all from the last few weeks, although the account was created 16 years ago.
Besides which, how is being a professional writer automatically connected with being a professional video editor?
I'm not sure that your analogy works, either. All he said was that it was difficult to replicate his existing workflow with free software in Ubuntu. He never claimed to be editing video to a professional level; that requirement seems to have come from you.
I don't do any video editing, but couldn't someone be editing sourced material (for, say, a documentary) that is MP4? That is, already produced material that wasn't originally shot by the creator in question.
Sure. If for whatever reason you need to re-edit something that you didn't shoot yourself and you don't have access to the source files. I suppose that would be one reason to edit the MP4 directly. (so for example, if you're re-editing someone's youtube video to make a remix of it for Tiktok). But I don't consider that to be "professional" editing.
Professional editing is getting hired by a filmmaker (or creating video yourself) that you then edit into a completed work. And in those cases, I'd question why they're either a) filming in a format like MP4 in the first place, or b) not making the LOG or ProRes source files available to their editor.
The people using free davinci resolve are also most likely to be working with h264 and h265.
It's bizarre that I can just install those codecs and have resolve pick them up from the system like other media players do.