Welcome to politcal memes!
These are our rules:
1) Be civil
Jokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.
2) No misinformation
Don’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.
3) Posts should be memes
Random pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.
4) No bots, spam or self-promotion
Follow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.
5) No AI generated content.
Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images
This is a great retort. But does this belong in this community? Is this a meme?
Do you not consider this a meme? If I may ask, why not?
Frankly, I have trouble defining what a 'meme' really is. Traditionally, a meme is an idea of some sort that spreads through a culture. A more modern definition would be:
An amusing or interesting item (such as a captioned picture or video) or genre of items that is spread widely online especially through social media
So personally I would say this post a meme and thus belongs here. However, I don't know if Webster's definition is really what posters here, and more importantly the mods here, would use.
Does spitting fire as truth have a right to our memes?
What exactly is Israel? The government? The people? The corporations? Which aspect of the country has a right to exist exactly?
The part systematically killing off an entire population of people? No. That part has no right to exist.
The fullfilment of prophecy to bring about the end times according to their doomsday cult.
Jesus fucking christ so basically every power structure that men inhabit has rights but people don't have rights?
We don't need to tolerate this bullshit.
Since when did states have rights?
Yeah, "does Israel have a right to exist?" is a nonsense question. What's the difference between a state with that right and one that doesn't? Is a state that has a "right to exist" therefore somehow beyond reproach? I think it's a rhetorical tool that is meant to confuse people, because any clear eyed understanding of reality leaves Israel looking obviously terrible.
its always been a laundering scheme to go back into the campaigns of politicians, much like with the charter school vouchers. Which is why schumer, hakeem, slotkin, booker was so adamant to support them it funds thier stolen money lifestyles, and yes they are pratically dinos(actually the old moderate Rs)