this post was submitted on 06 Aug 2026
30 points (100.0% liked)

United Kingdom

6893 readers
251 users here now

General community for news/discussion in the UK.

Less serious posts should go in !casualuk@feddit.uk or !andfinally@feddit.uk
More serious politics should go in !uk_politics@feddit.uk.

Try not to spam the same link to multiple feddit.uk communities.
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric news, and should be either a link to a reputable source, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread.

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] dparticiple@sh.itjust.works 15 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

I'm reading this as an outsider (US) and wondering who the people proposing these policies are, and why they're so opposed to fun, nightlife, and supporting long-standing traditions? I've been to the UK many times and loved the pub scene.

Is this is an anti-alcohol ploy dressed in crime-fighting garb?

[–] flamingos@feddit.uk 20 points 4 weeks ago

who the people proposing these policies

Tories.

why they’re so opposed to fun, nightlife, and supporting long-standing traditions

Because they're Tories.

[–] abrasiveteapot@sh.itjust.works 5 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

The council area is London's biggest night life area, the local residents have elected a council who is determined to kill that. Businesses dont get to vote. So the small number if residents get to kill thousands of businesses.

It is democracy but not as we know it it Jim

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 7 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

I will never understand the mentality of people moving to an area known for its lively nightlife, and then complaining about said lively nightlife being too loud. Yeah it is loud, that's why hardly anyone wants to live there, why do you live there?

I've just properly read the article now. They are complaining about Soho, which is rather like the residents of las Vegas complaining about casinos, if you killed the casinos you kill the city because there's bugger all else there.

[–] tenebrisnox@feddit.uk 11 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Just shut the pubs. And the night clubs. And the cinemas. And the theatres. It's about time we all started wearing black and white clothing, covering our heads and restoring the Puritan way of life. Wasn't the UK a much happier place when we had witch-hunters and ducking stools?

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 4 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

You can't dunk witches in the River anymore. It's to polluted

[–] ohulancutash@feddit.uk 3 points 3 weeks ago

They’d burn quicker afterward though.

[–] Guilvareux@feddit.uk 1 points 3 weeks ago

You’re right. It would be unethical.

[–] reallykindasorta@slrpnk.net 7 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

I don’t even understand the intention

[–] fakeman_pretendname@feddit.uk 15 points 4 weeks ago (3 children)

Historically, "bars" which had almost no seating or tables, and nowhere to even put your drink down for a second, meant that people kept their drink in hand all the time, which meant they'd finish a pint in 15 minutes instead of 30 minutes - so after 2 hours, 8 pints in, the bar had made a tidy profit, and the fully shitfaced customer would stagger down to the kebab shop, start a fight and then throw up on their own shoes.

By comparison, a pub, with chairs and tables, people would drink half as much in the same time period, and perhaps be less likely to engage in the kebab shop fight/vomit situation.

I think that's what they're getting at - which I can sort of see, but making it all "table service only" sounds silly though. Just give them some little shelves round the walls and columns to put their drinks down on.

[–] abrasiveteapot@sh.itjust.works 6 points 4 weeks ago

It's a good explanation and would be logical if the council were acting in good faith, however the primary driver here is to reduce the number of people who are able to patronise these pubs and thus put them out of business.

A table and 4 chairs takes about the same space as a dozen people standing, and most of these pubs are on comparatively thin margins. Reduce the turnover by that much and they're out of business. Which is what this residents group wants.

They're pushing a lot of other restrictions not just the no standing, closing pubs at 10pm on weekends is clearly intended to make them less attractive to potential patrons for example

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 3 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

I think that's the way they're trying to frame it. I'm not sure it's particularly true. Many of the bars in Soho and in the UK in general are just tiny and need standing service or they wouldn't be able to operate.

[–] reallykindasorta@slrpnk.net 2 points 4 weeks ago

I see! Thanks for the explanation. I agree it seems like providing some seating and darts is a happy middleground, I want a safe place to lounge when I drink and don’t want to bother the sober people.

[–] Babalugats@feddit.uk 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Would love to see the person that introduced this, and would love to have been there when they did, to see who all the others were that thought it was a great idea, and then ask the locals if they voted for any of them, and if so, why.