this post was submitted on 29 Jul 2026
87 points (98.9% liked)

World News

41851 readers
186 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 7 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Infamousblt@hexbear.net 28 points 2 months ago

Material reality starting to catch up to the idealistic capitalist periphery

[–] doleo@lemmy.one 28 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (3 children)

~ 523,000,000,000 euro, in case anyone (like me) was wondering

[–] ZeroHora@lemmy.ml 10 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] dropdrip@lemmy.ml 25 points 2 months ago

Something something... free markets... capitalism--no! Not like that!

[–] gary_host_laptop@lemmy.ml 19 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] hydrashok@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 months ago

Let’s fucking goooooo

[–] PanArab@lemmy.ml 15 points 2 months ago (2 children)

ROK had three main advantages that allowed it to be more prosperous than DPRK:

  1. It wasn't mostly destroyed by the US during the war.
  2. It has plenty of plains suitable for farming while DPRK has steep mountainous terrain.
  3. It wasn't sanctioned or embargoed.

Other events like the fall of the USSR and a major flood have also set DPRK back.

It will be interesting to watch if DPRK becomes the more prosperous nation long-term due to socialism simply being a better economic system and what this will mean for future reunification. But I am getting ahead of myself.

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 11 points 2 months ago (1 children)

My prediction is that social collapse in the south will eventually lead to reunification.

[–] ikilledtheradiostar@hexbear.net 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Didn't unoccupied Korea say they were no longer interested in reunification? Why would they want to rehabilitate that cess pool?

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 14 points 2 months ago (4 children)

Yeah, the new policy is they're not going to seek reunification, but I think that mostly implies that they see no reason to take over the south by force. If there was a collapse in the south, integrating it would mean removing US presence from their border. And that would be very valuable.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] leftOverLife@lemmy.ml 9 points 2 months ago (1 children)

It will be interesting to watch if DPRK becomes the more prosperous nation long-term

Its been interesting to see the recent economic successes of the DPRK and to watch how even the capitalist media in the US is starting to concede to it. Now, whether that means that the US is going to try to get them to "open up" like China did is anyone's guess.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ncc74656@lemmy.ml 13 points 2 months ago (64 children)
load more comments (64 replies)
[–] DivineChaos100@hexbear.net 11 points 2 months ago

More like 864 trillion lost

[–] orc_princess@lemmy.ml 9 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Is this just fraud as usual or is there something else going on? Is it at all related to antitrust allegations of price fixing and such?

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 22 points 2 months ago (4 children)

China's CXMT just broke the global memory chip duopoly held by Samsung, SK Hynix and Micron. Their IPO caused a major global semiconductor stock rout and Korean markets halted trading because it's basically propped up by these companies. And on top of that, there are now increasing worries about the whole AI bubble built on circular investments. If data center build out stops then the demand for chips and memory is going to collapse too.

[–] Thesilverpig@lemmy.ml 8 points 2 months ago

*starcraft marine, "Hell... It's about time."

[–] Lenins_Dumbbell@lemmygrad.ml 7 points 2 months ago

Stop, I can only get so erect

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] bennieandthez@lemmygrad.ml 9 points 2 months ago

if we're bneing honest, that index should halve again to be where it should be, what even happened the last year? that index went like +300% in a single year

load more comments
view more: next ›