this post was submitted on 10 Jul 2026
1115 points (99.3% liked)

Selfhosted

60707 readers
645 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

Detailed Rules Post

  1. Be civil.

  2. No spam.

  3. Posts are to be related to self-hosting.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or readme if you're providing a link.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title.

  6. No trolling.

  7. Promotion posts require active participation, with an account that is at least 30 days old. F/LOSS without a paywall has exceptions, with requirements. See the rules link for details. Tags [CBH] or [AIP] are required, see the links in Rule 8 for details.

  8. AI-related discussions and AI-involved promotional posts have additional requirements for tagging, as noted in Rule 7 and the AI & Promotional Post Expanded Rules post, and find example disclosures here.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] yucandu@lemmy.world 204 points 6 days ago (5 children)

A 24hr waiting period to use a competitor's product has to be one of the most blatant anti-competitive behaviour in history.

[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 48 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (4 children)

If only the founding fathers had written the right to bear apps shall not be infringed in an amendment.

Oh well can't change the ancient text now, just have to be governed by it forever. 🀷 (It's a shame the ancient powder-wigged wizards that wrote the constitution weren't clairvoyant.)

[–] Bacano@lemmy.world 26 points 6 days ago (3 children)

If only there were some way to change the ancient text. Some sort of amend-sion. Surely our benevolent leaders would have figured something like that out by now. I guess we'll just have to keep voting and hoping every four years

[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 14 points 6 days ago

We've tried nothing and we're all out of ideas

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] percent@infosec.pub 88 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I genuinely appreciate the cause, but to sign this, I have to provide PII, agree to their terms of service and privacy policy, and get automatically opted-in to their mailing list that I'll have to unsubscribe from later.

So to petition against this shitty tech stuff, I have to go through this other shitty tech stuff. It sucks how normalized this all has become.

[–] justme@lemmy.dbzer0.com 20 points 5 days ago (2 children)

here it makes at least some sense to verify that each person voted once. the mail list stuff is of course to much and should be optional from the beginning.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 114 points 6 days ago (21 children)

please just make an android alternative

I want a phone that isn't a closed ecosystem race to the bottom shit phone

[–] jabjoe@feddit.uk 65 points 6 days ago (1 children)

There are, but the market is rigged by monopolists. And things like banks increasingly require apps that won't even run on customer Android ROMs easily.

The regulators are needed here.

[–] lemmysmash@piefed.social 24 points 6 days ago (2 children)

The problem with regulators is that they a) gladly suck corporate dicks, b) gladly opt-in for the same authoritarian methods of population control, and c) gladly ignore common sense altogether.

[–] karlhungus@lemmy.ca 14 points 6 days ago

"a" has a name: regulatory capture.

Regulators have in the past fulfilled their role, they've just been hamstrung.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] rtxn@lemmy.world 48 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (13 children)

All of the alternatives eventually run into the same "Will my banking app work on it?" problem. The absence of a healthy app economy is the one thing that can't be fixed by throwing software engineers at it, and it is what caused the death of Windows Phone.

[–] vrighter@discuss.tchncs.de 11 points 6 days ago

my banking app already doesn't work on my phone, because it doesn't like termux:x11 and an autoclicker i have installed for an idle game

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] atopi@piefed.blahaj.zone 24 points 6 days ago (1 children)

i hope linux phones succeed

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Mubelotix@jlai.lu 9 points 5 days ago (2 children)

The issue is the hardware, we already have software

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (17 replies)
[–] muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works 63 points 5 days ago (6 children)

You aren’t going to keep Android open. Respond by shoring up Linux phones.

[–] webkitten@piefed.social 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I mean with enough support you could hostile takeover the codebase.

[–] muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 days ago

Or you could beat them over the head with their own consequences and leave the platform en masse

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 22 points 5 days ago

Not only would that solve this little problem, it would reduce Google's power and remove one's data from the claws of US authorities (were the Patriot and Cloud acts let them mass track everybody using a Google product).

Just make sure you chose a non-US Linux phone.

[–] agent_nycto@lemmy.world 10 points 5 days ago (3 children)

I don't want to buy a new phone

[–] eleitl@lemmy.zip 14 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Google doesn't give a shit about what you want. It only understands two things: credible legal threats and not giving them your money.

load more comments (2 replies)

I don't want to, but I will if I have to

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] cactus_head@programming.dev 9 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (6 children)

Most of the world can't afford to buy one specific android and hope not to brick it. Most people can't afford a google pixel and if they can, aren't going to risk it.

And what happens when google cuts off third party tools like MicroG. I need WhatsApp for almost everything from talking to family and friends to Work. Most of the world does, and the same is true for Facebook.

[–] alfredon996@feddit.it 8 points 5 days ago

Most people can’t afford a google pixel and if they can, aren’t going to risk it.

And they shouldn't. By buying Pixels you are supporting Google, the same company that is destroying Android freedom.

Today's best alternatives are phones that come preloaded with custom ROMs (Brax3, Fairphone, Murena, IodΓ©, and so on), or if you're feeling more adventurous, a Linux phone (I have heard good things about FuriLabs FLX1).

[–] NewNewAugustEast@lemmy.zip 5 points 5 days ago

Then you are fucked right? What's app and Facebook have you.

I too live somewhere this is expected. I said no. I won't do it. Facebook is easy, because whatever.

WhatsApp is harder even the doctors want to use it. But I won't. Someone has to start saying no.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)

Mandate that all boot loaders can be unlocked by consumers/device owners!

That single change alone would open the floodgates of development.

Manufacturer locked boot loaders was the single biggest mistake made in the phone world. Now just consider all the work it'll take to reverse that simple misstep made years ago that nobody gave a single thought to.

[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 8 points 4 days ago

let's get real..google isn't going to stop. why would they? there's zero repercussions for their aggressive strategy against their own consumers.

so stop using their products. cut google out, entirely.

[–] l3mming@lemmy.world 45 points 6 days ago (5 children)

The number of times that signing an online petition has prevented the plans of an evil corporation is exactly zero.

[–] coredev@programming.dev 17 points 6 days ago (4 children)

I am not so sure. It creats activity, being passive is worse. We should encourage all type of protests, even petitions.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Axolotl_cpp@feddit.it 12 points 5 days ago

There are already some movements, like #Keep Android Open that ask to contact local regulators and law makers, this petition is useful to have a concrete number of people that agree and that can be used officially

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] curbstickle@anarchist.nexus 63 points 6 days ago (11 children)

@duckling5746@lemmy.today as a reminder the reason this is related to self-hosting should be obvious, whether in the title or the post text.

For this one, I'll note that this is key to self-hosting, and I think many know it. Many, myself included, use f-droid or similar 3rd party repos to manage the apps that we use with our self-hosted setup. With this change, many of the current apps we enjoy using will either need to register with Google, or essentially become unused. While there is a way to still do it, it is really messy, and requires an absolutely wild number of steps + 24hr "cooling off period". Its ridiculous.

Personally, I'm leaving the android ecosystem one way or the other. It may be using an android phone and hotspotting for another device running PMOS or similar, or getting a Moto with Graphene, whatever, but this change is impactful and horrendous.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] gankouskhan@piefed.zip 5 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I guess at a certain point I just stop using electronics.

[–] bigFab@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

That's how big tech wins. Complete monopoly.

[–] gankouskhan@piefed.zip 1 points 2 days ago

Monopoly over me not paying for their stuff? I guess. Seems more like not supporting them to me. If they errode my choice then I make the only choice that gives me agency. I don't give them my money.

[–] deczzz@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 5 days ago

Only an Android alternative will fix this. No amount of proactive work from users will change Google's mind on this.

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 5 days ago

Most online petitions are nothing more than a way to safely (for those targeted and for those amongst the authorities who support them even against the public interest) dissipate the common people's righteous indignation, by making them feel like they "did something" whilst said something is just about the least impactful thing imaginable.

(Some official ones, for example those mandating parliamentary sessions on the subject if they reach a certain threshold, might not be so, though its unclear as it really depends on the legislation around it allowing politicians to just ignore it at will)

This bullshit will require a lot more than adding your name into a list on some corner of the web in some legal jurisdiction where they're free to sell your private information.

[–] lechekaflan@lemmy.world 19 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Fuck you Pichai. They should be sued.

[–] lIlIlIlIlIlIl@lemmy.world 20 points 6 days ago (20 children)

All this effort going towards β€œsaving” green fascism when we should be pouring these efforts into Linux

load more comments (20 replies)
[–] placebo@lemmy.zip 17 points 6 days ago (3 children)
[–] Ooops@feddit.org 23 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Petitions are useless

Protests are useless

Governments and corporations conspire to implement surveilance knowing what comes next

<-- we are here

Actual resistence

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] DandomRude@lemmy.world 16 points 6 days ago (2 children)

That is simply wrong. Public pressure can certainly be effective. In any case, it's definitely better than doing nothing at all.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next β€Ί